|
Next: {IMPORTANT POST} Real Life Mutant Found!
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Mar 03, 2004
Posts: 175
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:28 am
Post subject: AXM #2 (minor spoiler)
Archived from groups: rec>arts>comics>marvel>xbooks (more info?)
|
|
|
LOCKHEED RULES!
Ahem!
Thankyou for your time <g>
Christian
--
"The Dark Phoenix may have been a threat to all life in the universe...
But she had great taste in costumes." (Rachel Summers Excalibur #65) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 999
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:45 am
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Christian Smith wrote:
> LOCKHEED RULES!
Oh yeah! I kind of disturbed the other people at the coffee shop when I saw
that.
But the NERVE of those reporters asking Kitty about her pet bat. Bat?! BAT?!
Grr...
--
-=[ The BlakGard ]=-
"Somewhere there's danger;
somewhere there's injustice,
and somewhere else the tea is getting cold!"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 28, 2004
Posts: 230
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:45 am
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"The Black Guardian" <blakgard DeleteThis @aol.coma.org> wrote in message
news:20040624204557.11526.00000393@mb-m23.aol.com...
> Christian Smith wrote:
> > LOCKHEED RULES!
>
> Oh yeah! I kind of disturbed the other people at the coffee shop when I
saw
> that.
>
> But the NERVE of those reporters asking Kitty about her pet bat. Bat?!
BAT?!
> Grr...
I detected a bit of sexual undertone in the question, too, which makes it
worse.
Still, it was great to see Lockheed again. It'll be interesting to see what
his story is.
Whedon really is going full-scale nostalgia on us. He really is writing for
the hardcore X-fan, which is great to see. I can't wait to see what's next.
Hopefully, this mutant cure will revert Beast back to his previous form so
that we can be done with this one.
Dave<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 999
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:10 am
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
David Henry wrote:
>>> LOCKHEED RULES!
>>
>> Oh yeah! I kind of disturbed the other people at the coffee shop when I
>> saw that.
>>
>> But the NERVE of those reporters asking Kitty about her pet bat. Bat?!
>> BAT?! Grr...
>
> I detected a bit of sexual undertone in the question, too, which makes it
> worse.
Oh, I don't know. Kitty could sure do worse than Lockheed... and has, at least
twice. 
--
-=[ The BlakGard ]=-
"Somewhere there's danger;
somewhere there's injustice,
and somewhere else the tea is getting cold!"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 15, 2004
Posts: 25
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:18 am
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"David Henry" <telemachus7.TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote:
> Whedon really is going full-scale nostalgia on us. He really is writing for
> the hardcore X-fan, which is great to see.
Perhaps. But I appreciate that non-hardcore X-fans can enjoy it as well.
(Although I did have trouble with the Kitty sequence in #1.)
> Hopefully, this mutant cure will revert Beast back to his previous form so
> that we can be done with this one.
I hope not -- I love the visual, especially when Cassaday does it.
Gorgeous.
--
Johanna Draper Carlson
Reviews of Comics Worth Reading -- <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.comicsworthreading.com" target="_blank">http://www.comicsworthreading.com</a>
Blogging at <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.comicsworthreading.com/blog/cwr.html" target="_blank">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/blog/cwr.html</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 57
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> Hopefully, this mutant cure will revert Beast back to his previous form so
> that we can be done with this one.
Would that be the 'classic' blue furred version?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 28, 2004
Posts: 230
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Elfbard" <elfbard.DeleteThis@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:40dbbaa8_1@news.iprimus.com.au...
>
> > Hopefully, this mutant cure will revert Beast back to his previous form
so
> > that we can be done with this one.
>
> Would that be the 'classic' blue furred version?
Yes. The form he was in during his stint with the Avengers. Everyone seems
to draw that version just fine (John Byrne and Jim Lee especially).
I just don't want to see Hank in human form again. When X-Factor was first
launced, that was the form he had and it looked stupid.
Dave<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 57
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 6:03 pm
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> > Would that be the 'classic' blue furred version?
>
> Yes. The form he was in during his stint with the Avengers. Everyone seems
> to draw that version just fine (John Byrne and Jim Lee especially).
Ah, cool. I liked that version.
> I just don't want to see Hank in human form again. When X-Factor was first
> launced, that was the form he had and it looked stupid.
The one with just big hands & feet?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 19, 2004
Posts: 260
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"David Henry" <telemachus7.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote in message
news:l42dnTAmOa6UZEbdRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
>
>
> Yes. The form he was in during his stint with the Avengers. Everyone seems
> to draw that version just fine (John Byrne and Jim Lee especially).
>
> I just don't want to see Hank in human form again. When X-Factor was first
> launced, that was the form he had and it looked stupid.
>
Well, issue 3 IIRC. The first major storyline involved him being kidnapped,
returned to "normal" human form and introduced Artie.
D.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 999
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:58 am
Post subject: Re: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Donnacha DeLong wrote:
>> Yes. The form he was in during his stint with the Avengers. Everyone seems
>> to draw that version just fine (John Byrne and Jim Lee especially).
>>
>> I just don't want to see Hank in human form again. When X-Factor was first
>> launced, that was the form he had and it looked stupid.
>
> Well, issue 3 IIRC. The first major storyline involved him being kidnapped,
> returned to "normal" human form and introduced Artie.
Wonder if they'll pull a similar stunt with issue 3 of AMX.
--
-=[ The BlakGard ]=-
"Somewhere there's danger;
somewhere there's injustice,
and somewhere else the tea is getting cold!"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AXM #2 (minor spoiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
