"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xh9jc.11657$gH6.6369@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> I had to do an article today where the lead author was A.J.
Davies,
> BM. (he was from St. Bart's Hospital in London). For some reason it sticks
in
> my mind that England gives a Bachelor's in Medicine instead of a BS in
> biology, etc., calling it "pre-med" Can either one of you UK types or one
of
> you Doc-types or anyone else clear this up for me??
A traditional course in Medicine in England is five years long and leads to
Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery at the end of those five years.
You usually start in the academic year in which you become 19 years old. On
successful completion of the five years, one is a "doctor" but must undergo
several more years clinical training. Just don't end up in hospital in
England in August, when the annual; crop of 23/24 year old "pre-regs" are
let loose on the wards for the first time.
Some medical schools have introduced a "mid way" examination after three
years of study, leading to a degree such as Bachelor of Medical Sciences.
Those students who decide that medicine is not the career for them have a
qualification that means that they have not wasted three years nor generated
debts with nothing to show for their trouble. These are academic degrees
and do not mean that the holder is qualified to practice medicine in any
way.
Some Universities have a graduate entry scheme, where a graduate in a
relevant scientific subject (ie a holder of a 3 or 4 year honours degree)
may join the 5 year BMBS course part way through.
This link has probably more information than you'd ever need to know!
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.medschoolguide.co.uk/schools.htm" target="_blank">http://www.medschoolguide.co.uk/schools.htm</a>
Best regards.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: A British medical credential I don't recognize