"j.rennie1" <j.rennie1 DeleteThis @ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:O4kkb.517$Re4.53@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net...
> You can join in this competition:
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.bbc.co/bigread</font" target="_blank">www.bbc.co/bigread</font</a>>
>
> My vote went to an American book and it wasn't Catcher in the Rye.
Do you know, I couldn't find one book on that list that I could be bothered
to vote for? I've read about half of the list and have knowledge of the
other half with only Wuthering Heights unattempted and obviously Corelli and
Harry Potter left well alone. Catcher in the Rye is one of the most boring
and irritating books I've ever give up on. As for Lord of the Rings, that
Tolkien was a sadistic cunt, inflicting that on me. Jo Brand, a fat
comedienne long favoured by Guardian readers, said in the Radio Times that
Nineteen Eighty-Four is '..pretty much the perfect novel..' which shows how
far the plain ignorant can travel these days. It is a shame, and you will
think me fascist*, but if voting for top books was made *compulsory* we'd
have had something interesting to talk about, as it is, it's just bourgeois
onanism**
**fifty pence in the bourgeois box
*fifty pence for mentioning 'fascist'
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Favourite Book