 |
|
 |
|
Next: Kindred Spirits: Body and Soul
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jun 21, 2004 Posts: 165
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:09 am
Post subject: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell Archived from groups: rec>arts>horror>written, others (more info?)
|
|
|
Our intrepid invigilators have taken heed of the fact that degrees in
Harry Potter are now available, so we are pleased to offer potential
scholars of the supernatural the opportunity of taking a GCSE in
Ramsey Campbell.
http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html
After having queried the language abilities of other writers in a less
than independent manner, we feel sure that Mr Campbell can have no
objection to seeing his own work examined in a similar fashion.
TTFN,
CB >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 303
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 26 Sep 2004 05:09:31 -0700, hauntedriver DeleteThis @hotmail.com (Haunted
River) wrote:
>Our intrepid invigilators have taken heed of the fact that degrees in
>Harry Potter are now available, so we are pleased to offer potential
>scholars of the supernatural the opportunity of taking a GCSE in
>Ramsey Campbell.
>
>http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html
>
>After having queried the language abilities of other writers in a less
>than independent manner, we feel sure that Mr Campbell can have no
>objection to seeing his own work examined in a similar fashion.
>
>TTFN,
>
>CB
Poppy's right. Ramsey Campbell is the best of us all and hardly needs
me to defend him from an uncouth toad splashing slime on his shoes.
Where did you get the money for a copy of Told by the Dead? Did Selma
increase your allowance?
Now, little boy, I realize that this is just another pathetic bleat
for attention and I should heed my friend Don's advice and not feed
the troll, but you've just pissed me off, (and I mean pissed in the US
sense, not the British).
Here are just a few reasons why Ramsey is commonly considered the best
of us all:
1. Even his early Lovecraftian pastiches expanded on the themes of
Lovecraft and injected new life into a genre that had become moribund.
It's quite possible that without "Inhabitant" the dozens of writers
that began the same way might not have gotten a start at all. We might
have had a genre without many of its brightest stars.
2. The stories gathered in DEMONS BY DAYLIGHT ushered in the wave of
psychological horror that included the quiet horror of Charles L.
Grant, the work of T.M. Wright, T.E.D. Klein and others. An amazingly
influential book.
3. Working in another direction direction entirely, Campbell wrote an
entire book of erotic horror stories long before the market decided
that it was a genre. SACRED STIFF remains the standard for the genre,
and likely always will. I doubt that you'd be able to read it without
becoming overly excited.
4. His story "MacIntosh Willy" was selected the best story of the year
in which it appeared.
5. "The Tugging" is an incredbly influential and important work,
reintroducing the original concept of the Cthulhu Mythos as SF with an
atmosphere of horror. No "Tugging". You'll see more of the influence
of this story next year...
6. Alone with the Horrors is a massive volume with nary a clinker in
it, considering it's a fraction of Campbell's output, I'd say that's a
remarkable level of consistency over a thirty year period.
I don't have to the time or patience to cover his novels, most of
which are very fine indeed, and even the ones that don't quite work
for me are enjoyable reads due to the lyrical prose style that
Campbell employs.
Barker, you're miles and miles out of your league when you attack me
and my accomplishments; when you attack Ramsey, you're not even in the
same universe.
FOAD
John<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 18, 2003 Posts: 250
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Mr. Campbell's achievement will be remembered long after we are all dead,
but this loon will not recognize that. There is a certain 19th century
pompous cluelessness to this troll which reminds me of Charles Julius
Guiteau, a man of unspectacular achievement and unflagging conceit whose own
peculiar form of monomania buoyed him from one failure to another, then
through an humiliating trial and an assassin's death on the gallows. In his
own eyes, all of his actions were not only just, but ordained. Here is a
two-part profile of the man -
http://www.historyhouse.com/in_history/guiteau/ . Look familiar?
Jim >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 303
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:13:09 -0400, "Jim Rockhill"
<jrock DeleteThis @locallink.net> wrote:
>Mr. Campbell's achievement will be remembered long after we are all dead,
>but this loon will not recognize that. There is a certain 19th century
>pompous cluelessness to this troll which reminds me of Charles Julius
>Guiteau, a man of unspectacular achievement and unflagging conceit whose own
>peculiar form of monomania buoyed him from one failure to another, then
>through an humiliating trial and an assassin's death on the gallows. In his
>own eyes, all of his actions were not only just, but ordained. Here is a
>two-part profile of the man -
>http://www.historyhouse.com/in_history/guiteau/ . Look familiar?
>
>Jim
>
Thanks for the link... Amazingly close to the attitudes and antics of
a certain amphibian.
Though in all fairness, our croaking friend (fiend) can also be
compared to Baron Corvo and Count Stenbock. He has all of the former's
bile and the latter's monomania. Unfortunately, he lacks anything
approaching the literary talent of either... I doubt he'll manage
anything more than a footnote in a history of various Internet
nutters.
Cheers,
John<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 18, 2003 Posts: 250
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 1:44 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 01, 2003 Posts: 25
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:55 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Chris
You really are an obnoxious twat.
There, you've finally made me descend to your level. Feel better now?
Willie
hauntedriver DeleteThis @hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in message news:<f6c24082.0409260409.632d9620 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> Our intrepid invigilators have taken heed of the fact that degrees in
> Harry Potter are now available, so we are pleased to offer potential
> scholars of the supernatural the opportunity of taking a GCSE in
> Ramsey Campbell.
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html</font</a>>
>
> After having queried the language abilities of other writers in a less
> than independent manner, we feel sure that Mr Campbell can have no
> objection to seeing his own work examined in a similar fashion.
>
> TTFN,
>
> CB<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 21, 2004 Posts: 165
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:03 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
John Pelan <jpelan.RemoveThis@cnw.com> wrote in message
>
> Where did you get the money for a copy of Told by the Dead? Did *****
> increase your allowance?
>
Ah, the swift recourse to personal abuse and other people's family
members. How Pelanesque! It reminds me of that unsavoury incident in
English history when a cruel king offered one of his cronies the young
children of a mutual enemy to do with as he pleased (yes, he horribly
murdered them). No doubt that sort of thing would turn you on, judging
by your penchant for sadistic horror and your obsessive interest in
other people's families.
But anyway, here you again, leaping to preposterous conclusions.
Actually, I don't possess a copy of the book. I've never knowingly
seen it in fact. You are making the amusing error of assuming that I
set the exam questions.
I would point out to Mr Karswell that the questions were only set
after careful consideration by a / some most learned authority / ies.
Unfortunately the rules of the society prohibit my divulging the
identity / identities of the author/s to Mr Karswell. The sociedty
regrets that it cannot grant you an interview in person to discuss
this matter further.
Now, I shall allow you to resume your career of derriere-kissing and
lying. Because you ARE a proven liar, aren't you?
TTFN,
Chris Barker
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://hauntedriver.co.uk" target="_blank">http://hauntedriver.co.uk</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 21, 2004 Posts: 165
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:10 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jim Rockhill" <jrock.TakeThisOut@locallink.net> wrote in message news:<yOKdnY7EvqOavsrcRVn-jA.TakeThisOut@locallink.net>...
> Mr. Campbell's achievement will be remembered long after we are all dead,
> but this loon will not recognize that. There is a certain 19th century
> pompous cluelessness to this troll which reminds me of Charles Julius
> Guiteau, a man of unspectacular achievement and unflagging conceit whose own
> peculiar form of monomania buoyed him from one failure to another, then
> through an humiliating trial and an assassin's death on the gallows. In his
> own eyes, all of his actions were not only just, but ordained. Here is a
> two-part profile of the man -
> <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.historyhouse.com/in_history/guiteau/" target="_blank">http://www.historyhouse.com/in_history/guiteau/</a> . Look familiar?
>
> Jim
Father Rockhill:
Alternatively, instead of posting links to subjective and distinctly
tenuous nonsense, you could actually - for once! - respond by
disputing the comments made on my website.
Of course, if you secretly acknowledge that in the examples quoted
that Campbell has made some interesting literary / grammatical gaffes,
you could always sidestep the issue and post a link to an
irrevelant....say, haven't you just done that?
Rockhill - you are a prize idiot!
Chris Barker
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://hauntedriver.co.uk" target="_blank">http://hauntedriver.co.uk</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:23 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
hauntedriver.DeleteThis@hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in message news:<f6c24082.0409260409.632d9620.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> Our intrepid invigilators have taken heed of the fact that degrees in
> Harry Potter are now available, so we are pleased to offer potential
> scholars of the supernatural the opportunity of taking a GCSE in
> Ramsey Campbell.
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html</font</a>>
>
> After having queried the language abilities of other writers in a less
> than independent manner, we feel sure that Mr Campbell can have no
> objection to seeing his own work examined in a similar fashion.
>
> TTFN,
>
> CB
My gosh! The cheeky boldness! The sheer iconoclastic audacity of it
all! With nothing more than a handful of quotations stripped of any
semblance of context, the mystery man known to his handfuls of fans
as--erm--what was it again? "Chester Burroughs"? Anyway, this mystery
man of letters (i.e., hasty heated correspondence sent AND received,
the latter usually consisting of little more than the phrase "Just
piss off, would you?") has put together, using a mere handful of
select quotes, a web page that--- well---- hmm, actually, when you
look at it a little more closely, a page that says sod all, really.
Comes across as nothing more than peevish, smug, slightly irrational
nit-picking, in fact, if you give it any kind of time at all.
Ah, well. Nothing much to get excited about after all. Let's move on,
then, shall we?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 21, 2004 Posts: 165
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 4:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
deathbird44.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com (City of Worms) wrote in message news:<9ac242c0.0409270623.6badd795.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> hauntedriver.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in message news:<f6c24082.0409260409.632d9620.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> > Our intrepid invigilators have taken heed of the fact that degrees in
> > Harry Potter are now available, so we are pleased to offer potential
> > scholars of the supernatural the opportunity of taking a GCSE in
> > Ramsey Campbell.
> >
<font color=green> > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.hauntedriver.co.uk/page19.html</font</a>>
> >
> > After having queried the language abilities of other writers in a less
> > than independent manner, we feel sure that Mr Campbell can have no
> > objection to seeing his own work examined in a similar fashion.
> >
> > TTFN,
> >
> > CB
>
> My gosh! The cheeky boldness! The sheer iconoclastic audacity of it
> all!
I think you're over-reacting. It isn't Watergate.
With nothing more than a handful of quotations stripped of any
> semblance of context, blah blah blah blah.....
Ah, I see that you're referring to Campbell's "review" of my booklet
in All Hallows. Yes, it was a sad little piece, was it not?
the mystery man known to his handfuls of fans
> as--erm--what was it again? "Chester Burroughs"? Anyway, this mystery
> man of letters (i.e., hasty heated correspondence sent AND received,
> the latter usually consisting of little more than the phrase "Just
> piss off, would you?") has put together, using a mere handful of
> select quotes, a web page that--- well---- hmm, actually, when you
> look at it a little more closely, a page that says sod all, really.
To quote the brilliant political stock-response answer:
Well, you would say that, wouldn't you?
No doubt if Campbell cited a similar number of examples of my literary
gaffes you would be chortling in sycophantic glee at his wit and
wisdom.
Good grief, the hypocrisy and shallowness of you Campbellites /
Rodenites / small press mafiosi is limitless. You must know how
unprincipled and hypocritical you all are, hence the need to evade,
explode and demonise.
> Comes across as nothing more than peevish, smug, slightly irrational
> nit-picking, in fact, if you give it any kind of time at all.
>
Do you know, that's precisely how several people have summarised
Campbell's review of my booklet? How intuitive you are!
TTFN 'anonymous' one,
CB<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 21, 2004 Posts: 165
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 4:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
willie.meikle.DeleteThis@btinternet.com (Willie Meikle) wrote in message news:<1b51b553.0409270455.5099522d.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> Chris
>
> You really are an obnoxious twat.
>
> There, you've finally made me descend to your level. Feel better now?
>
> Willie
>
Willie
What's obnoxious about turning the tables?
Campbell set out to highlight literary, grammatical and research
weaknesses in one of my publications (a "review" in All Hallows for
his crony Chris Roden); why can't I query his own failings and
weaknesses in return?
I'm sorry, but I don't think you are looking at this issue fairly. The
exam theme is simply an amusing framing reference for a serious point.
Which is that it's pretty hypocritical for people with greenhouses to
throw stones.
Are you really suggesting that Campbell should be immune from
criticism?
Chris
PS. No, there is no excuse for calling someone an 'obnoxious twat'.
Obnoxious yes, with some validation of course; but it's pretty unkind
to start calling those you don't agree with 'twats'. Even worse to
then excuse it as 'descending to (my) level'. I allege that Campbell
is a hypocrite and a nepotist - citing such evidence as I have - but
I don't recall calling him, or you for that matter, a 'twat'. No, you
plumbed that level by yourself.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 29, 2003 Posts: 86
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
hauntedriver RemoveThis @hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in message news:<f6c24082.0409270510.12180e0f RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
This entire thread is typical Barkerian bluster - all flash and fuss
with no substance - coupled with patented attempts at misdirection,
which amount to no more than logorrheic glosses on Pee Wee Herman's "I
know you are, but what am I?"
Ramsey Campbell went through a James Herbert period, did he? One could
present a tortuous argument that Mr. Campbell, as the creator of his
own fiction, may be too close to his own work to have noticed this
emulation, but I have read just about everything the man has
published, and this "James Herbert period" is news to me. I suspect it
would be an equal surprise to S. T. Joshi, who published a critical
study of Campbell's work via the University of Liverpool.
If Barker wants to be taken seriously, he should consider
1) taking constructive criticism when it is offered instead of lashing
out at everyone who has ever disagreed with him or taken issue with
the work he produces.
2) making some attempt to follow the maxim "Brevity is the soul of
wit" by using the fewest number of carefully placed words rather than
hundreds spewed at random.
3) learning the meaning of the word "indifferent", which he repeatedly
misuses, and the spelling of the word "liaise" which he repeatedly
misspells. Everyone misspells or uses a word incorrectly on occasion,
but Mr. Barker's orthographical errors and solecisms are as obstinate
as his mistaken belief that his opinion on everything he goes on about
at such length on so many sites is unassailable.
4) realizing that, although the word of multiple syllables used
correctly may be impressive to a few, when misused it is ridiculous to
all.
5) learning that people do not cease discussion with him because he
has "won" one of his specious, bilious, interminable arguments, but
because he, like the infamous Guiteau, will insist that A = B no
matter how many people have presented documentation to the contrary
and the flimsiness of his own evidence.
6) learning that his insistence on everyone else presenting proof of
their assertions followed by his own tendency to cry foul or bandy
about the words "sock-puppet", "conspiracy", "bias", "cronyism", etc.
when he is in turn asked for proof is apparent to all and convincing
to no one.
7) extrapolating his theories from quotations cited in context (note
this carefully - "in context") instead of following the Beavis and
Butthead School of Criticism by leaping to conclusions whenever the
word "tugging", "but(t)", the remote possiblity of a vagina dentata,
etc. ad nauseum may occur within a text.
 having enough sense to realize that crying, whining, whingeing,
sulking, fretting, and every other kind of pathetic posture he assumes
when people "demonise" him is rendered hollow by his own tendency to
come up with 3rd-grade level labels and nicknames for anyone who dares
to disagree with him.
9) taking responsibility for any mistakes he may have made instead of
blaming the increasing number of people he has alienated for
conspiring against him.
10) focusing on what he does well in order to make the next story,
magazine, or book better, instead of fixating upon what he perceives
as something someone else has done wrong.
That is more than enough time wasted. There is more to life than this
kind of petty, repetitive crap. If Barker has a life, he should return
to it.
Jim >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 01, 2003 Posts: 25
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:09 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
What you're doing is criticising RCs perceived failings without
recognising any of his great strengths. The hidey-hole of weasels
everywhere. To try to pretend that RC hasn't written some of the best
short horror fiction of the last thirty years is just sticking your
head in the sand.
And I would have more respect for you if you were in the slightest bit
able to take criticism like a man. All writers get criticised at some
point in their careers. Deal with it and move on. That's what most of
the rest of us do.
Willie
hauntedriver.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in message news:<f6c24082.0409271215.401933ac.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> willie.meikle.TakeThisOut@btinternet.com (Willie Meikle) wrote in message news:<1b51b553.0409270455.5099522d.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> > Chris
> >
> > You really are an obnoxious twat.
> >
> > There, you've finally made me descend to your level. Feel better now?
> >
> > Willie
> >
>
>
> Willie
>
> What's obnoxious about turning the tables?
>
> Campbell set out to highlight literary, grammatical and research
> weaknesses in one of my publications (a "review" in All Hallows for
> his crony Chris Roden); why can't I query his own failings and
> weaknesses in return?
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't think you are looking at this issue fairly. The
> exam theme is simply an amusing framing reference for a serious point.
> Which is that it's pretty hypocritical for people with greenhouses to
> throw stones.
>
> Are you really suggesting that Campbell should be immune from
> criticism?
>
> Chris
>
> PS. No, there is no excuse for calling someone an 'obnoxious twat'.
> Obnoxious yes, with some validation of course; but it's pretty unkind
> to start calling those you don't agree with 'twats'. Even worse to
> then excuse it as 'descending to (my) level'. I allege that Campbell
> is a hypocrite and a nepotist - citing such evidence as I have - but
> I don't recall calling him, or you for that matter, a 'twat'. No, you
> plumbed that level by yourself.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 08, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 4:26 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
hauntedriver.RemoveThis@hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in
news:f6c24082.0409271215.401933ac@posting.google.com:
> Are you really suggesting that Campbell should be immune from
> criticism?
>
No, he's suggesting, as about six billion of your betters have at this
point, that you wouldn't know what "criticism" was if it bit your cock off.
--Robert
--
***
My Head Is Filled with Yeast
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/spimby/" target="_blank">http://www.livejournal.com/users/spimby/</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:22 am
Post subject: Re: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
hauntedriver.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (Haunted River) wrote in message news:<f6c24082.0409271206.74c754d4.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> No doubt if Campbell cited a similar number of examples of my literary
> gaffes you would be chortling in sycophantic glee at his wit and
> wisdom.
Actually, I've been altogether avoiding this spat and any messages
pertaining to it. Nowadays, at the first hint of the "Haunted
River"/Campbell fracas raising its head in a particular discussion, I
go elsewhere. That's it. Life's too short. Unfortunately for me,
though, I just couldn't resist having a look at this subject, and now
it seems I've fallen back into the muck of your rabid little
small-press vendetta again.
As for the accusation of "sycophancy", it's no less presumptuous than
any of your more famous claims of insight into the character and
conduct of a certain notable genre figure. That's not to say I have
any intention of denying my inclination to heap praise on much of
Campbell's work whenever the discussion comes up--because, as far as
I'm concerned, that praise has always been justified entirely by the
quality of the works in question, and has never been a matter of
attempting to win Mr. Campbell's favor or his friendship. And likewise
I have no qualms about speaking openly and honestly about those works
of his, relatively few of them though there be, that for whatever
reason proved disappointing: for example, one of his last novels,
"Darkest Part of the Woods", which struck me as a little weak.
Anyway, since I'm already tainted by my association with this topic,
let me briefly draw the discussion back to the site in question.
Whereas most of your "points" come across as petty carping over fairly
simple turns of phrase, the sort of vapid criticism one expects from
only the least experienced, least literate of internet
reader-reviewers, one example in particular sticks in my craw. I refer
to "Question 6", i.e., "Consider the following two sentences about
trains: ..." It seems that second of these sentences has been
incorrectly transcribed by yourself so that it reads as nonsense, and
grammatically screwy nonsense at that. Otherwise, besides the fact
that they both involve trains, there doesn't seem to be any real
resemblance between the two. The first sentence is quite a clear,
straightforward enough piece of writing as it is, certainly offering
nothing I can see to complain about.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Take a GCSE in Ramsey Campbell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|