High Evoulutionary an Mutants

BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
> Should he mutate Mutants?

IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with just the
New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures, every day, and
five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary should be at the
forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

The Black Guardian <blakgard.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in
news:1187428108.241378.55130@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

> BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
>> Should he mutate Mutants?
>
> IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with just the
> New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures, every day, and
> five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary should be at the
> forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.

Why bother? When you're mutating humans left and right, does it matter
of they're actually mutants? Is Spider-Girl a mutant? To my knowledge
she isn't, but she still inherited her father's powers. Doesn't that
suggest that mutations can be passed on? If that's the case, the world
could easily be populated with "human" mutates and it wouldn't really be
any different.
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

Dan McEwen wrote:
> The Black Guardian wrote:
>> BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
>>> Should he mutate Mutants?
>
>> IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with just
>> the New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures, every
>> day, and five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary should be
>> at the forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.
>
> Why bother? When you're mutating humans left and right, does it
> matter of they're actually mutants? Is Spider-Girl a mutant? To
> my knowledge she isn't, but she still inherited her father's
> powers. Doesn't that suggest that mutations can be passed on? If
> that's the case, the world could easily be populated with "human"
> mutates and it wouldn't really be any different.

Right. It doesn't matter if they're actually mutants, but that's why
he should. Why stick to mutating cows and wolves and stuff?
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

The Black Guardian <blakgard.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in
news:1187499306.975954.249250@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:

> Dan McEwen wrote:
>> The Black Guardian wrote:
>>> BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
>>>> Should he mutate Mutants?
>>
>>> IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with just
>>> the New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures, every
>>> day, and five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary should be
>>> at the forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.
>>
>> Why bother? When you're mutating humans left and right, does it
>> matter of they're actually mutants? Is Spider-Girl a mutant? To
>> my knowledge she isn't, but she still inherited her father's
>> powers. Doesn't that suggest that mutations can be passed on? If
>> that's the case, the world could easily be populated with "human"
>> mutates and it wouldn't really be any different.
>
> Right. It doesn't matter if they're actually mutants, but that's why
> he should. Why stick to mutating cows and wolves and stuff?

Actually, what I should have said is "Why should the High Evolutionary
care?" He's not a mutant. The existence of mutants means the eventual
end of non-mutants. He has no particular incentive to save mutantkind.
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

Dan McEwen wrote:
> The Black Guardian wrote:
>> Dan McEwen wrote:
>>> The Black Guardian wrote:
>>>> BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
>>>>> Should he mutate Mutants?
>>>>
>>>> IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with
>>>> just the New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures,
>>>> every day, and five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary
>>>> should be at the forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.
>>>
>>> Why bother? When you're mutating humans left and right, does it
>>> matter of they're actually mutants? Is Spider-Girl a mutant? To
>>> my knowledge she isn't, but she still inherited her father's
>>> powers. Doesn't that suggest that mutations can be passed on?
>>> If that's the case, the world could easily be populated with
>>> "human" mutates and it wouldn't really be any different.
>>
>> Right. It doesn't matter if they're actually mutants, but that's
>> why he should. Why stick to mutating cows and wolves and stuff?
>
> Actually, what I should have said is "Why should the High
> Evolutionary care?" He's not a mutant. The existence of mutants
> means the eventual end of non-mutants. He has no particular
> incentive to save mutantkind.

He should care because he's a scientist. His plan has always been the
continuing evolution of mankind, which includes mutants. Mutants are
not separate from mankind; they are part of it.

A better question would be why he cares about cows, wolves, and stuff.
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

The Black Guardian <blakgard.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in
news:1187589313.398832.59440@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com:

> Dan McEwen wrote:

>> Actually, what I should have said is "Why should the High
>> Evolutionary care?" He's not a mutant. The existence of mutants
>> means the eventual end of non-mutants. He has no particular
>> incentive to save mutantkind.
>
> He should care because he's a scientist. His plan has always been the
> continuing evolution of mankind, which includes mutants. Mutants are
> not separate from mankind; they are part of it.

Evolution is not a straight line. Two species that were once thought to
be ancestors of humanity are the Neanderthals and Homo Habilis. They're
human-like and extinct. Yet, they didn't turn into us. It turns out we
had a common ancestor. Just because they're human it doesn't mean they
have to be next.

> A better question would be why he cares about cows, wolves, and stuff.

Easier to play with on the "ethical" front?
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

> > BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
> >> Should he mutate Mutants?
> >
> > IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with just the
> > New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures, every day, and
> > five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary should be at the
> > forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.
>
> Why bother? When you're mutating humans left and right, does it matter
> of they're actually mutants? Is Spider-Girl a mutant? To my knowledge
> she isn't, but she still inherited her father's powers. Doesn't that
> suggest that mutations can be passed on? If that's the case, the world
> could easily be populated with "human" mutates and it wouldn't really be
> any different.


Any human mutated will have some part mutant inherently a part of them
already to some minor or major level. We humans are always mutating to some
extent

Mike

99 cent comics for sale at http://www.99centcomicsonline.com
12,000 plus books available.

OR

Modern comics for sale at
http://www.dustcatchers.com/modernage/amodern.html
More books added on a weekly basis
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:40:19 GMT, "Mike T" <m.tickal RemoveThis @mchsi.com> wrote:

>> > BLACKMYSTECH RANGER wrote:
>> >> Should he mutate Mutants?
>> >
>> > IMO, the High Evolutionary should stop piddling around with just the
>> > New Men. He should be evolving all kinds of creatures, every day, and
>> > five times on Sundays. The High Evolutionary should be at the
>> > forefront of trying to fix the Decimation.
>>
>> Why bother? When you're mutating humans left and right, does it matter
>> of they're actually mutants? Is Spider-Girl a mutant? To my knowledge
>> she isn't, but she still inherited her father's powers. Doesn't that
>> suggest that mutations can be passed on? If that's the case, the world
>> could easily be populated with "human" mutates and it wouldn't really be
>> any different.
>
>
>Any human mutated will have some part mutant inherently a part of them
>already to some minor or major level. We humans are always mutating to some
>extent

No, it actually is more along the lines of Homo Hablis vs.
Neanderthal....mutants are a different sapien line. People can be born
with powers, but unless they have the x-gene, they are not considered
mutants, just meta-humans. Daisy Johnson points this out in Secret
Wars (the last one), that she inherited powers because her father (Mr.
Hyde, I think?) was a powered human, but that she does not have the
x-gene, so she is not a mutant. It's a powered Homo Sapiens vs. a
normal Homo Superior.
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants 

<ba> wrote in message news:2oor341hie1d9tfk0mobc5phqk7eeif32s@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:40:19 GMT, "Mike T" <m.tickal.DeleteThis@mchsi.com> wrote:
> No, it actually is more along the lines of Homo Hablis vs.
> Neanderthal....mutants are a different sapien line. People can be born
> with powers, but unless they have the x-gene, they are not considered
> mutants, just meta-humans. Daisy Johnson points this out in Secret
> Wars (the last one), that she inherited powers because her father (Mr.
> Hyde, I think?) was a powered human, but that she does not have the
> x-gene, so she is not a mutant. It's a powered Homo Sapiens vs. a
> normal Homo Superior.

Then Franklin Richards also isn't a mutant?
 >> Stay informed about: High Evoulutionary an Mutants