Welcome to BookBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Hobbit film

 
   Book Forums (Home) -> J.R.R. Tolkien RSS
Author Message
Linards Ticmanis

External


Since: Mar 10, 2005
Posts: 8



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:40 am
Post subject: Hobbit film
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien, others (more info?)

Ok, another thread on this one.

1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.
Reasons: There's honestly not 13 real fleshed out dwarf personalities in
the Book. Also it is less confusing for the "uninitiated" not to have
similar names so I chose the most fleshed out one from every
similarily-named group. Six dwarves makes the Hobbit No. 7, still a
"lucky number". Thorin needs no explanation. Balin and Gloin, because of
the LOTR connections.(And Balin also because of his well defined
personality.) Dori, because he is closest to the Hobbit in several
scenes. Bombur for comic relief -- with full license from the Author
this time. Maybe Kili instead of Fili, I don't remember who of them is
more active and I don't have an e-text to look this up quickly -- but
one of them needs to die defending Thorin. As long as you don't have the
cliché "seven dwarfs", I think reducing their number is perfectly
acceptable.

2.) It would be great if John Rhys-Davis could play Gloin and Orlando
Bloom could play Thranduil. Both are a bit older now, which fits
perfectly. Legolas could be visible in passing once or twice, just use
some bluescreen left over from the LOTR cutting floor. I wouldn't have
Aragorn, Arwen, or Gimli appearing - I think Arwen was in Lothlorien at
the time and the others are too young to just appear without comment;
and I wouldn't like an appearance "with comment" since they are not
important to the story. (don't remember if Gimli was even born at the time).

3.) Hugo Weaving (sp?), the Sackville-Bagginses from the SEE (don't know
the actors' real names), and maybe Ian McKellen should be there -- but
only if they can get McKellen not to look much older than his grey
version looked anyway.

4.) I honestly don't think Elijah Wood would make a good Bilbo. He just
doesn't look tough enough and I think he's still too young. I'd try
getting a new actor. Suggestions? I'm thinking of someone more along the
lines of the Deagol character from the ROTK film prologue.

5.) If any major scene has to be left out, I'd say drop Beorn if you
must. I think it is the least filmable chapter (the animals would be
hard to do without getting a caricature) and also doesn't add all that
much to Bilbo's character. You could quickly reprovision the group at
some small settlement of the Beornings or the Woodmen without having an
outstanding character among them. Next thing to drop would be Rivendell,
but that hurts already. Of course there are small thing which could go,
like the boating across the Mirkwood River (just have Bombur step into a
little brook or so).

6.) I don't think you can introduce a love interest into the plot
without totally changing it. Face it, there simply are no women in the
story to any meaningful extent (except for the spiders Smile. So don't.

7.) I don't yet have a good idea on who should do Smaug's voice. An
actor that has played Mafia patriarchs or some such before could be good.

8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
important to get right. He should not be a caricature so the drama in
the end doesn't lose its power. But he should be over-serious in a fun
way. Maybe somebody who has played a goverment official or a master
craftsman of some sort before.

8.) Other important characters to be filled: The trolls, the Great
Orc(?), Bard, the Mayor.

fup2 rabt.
--
Linards Ticmanis

"Ego Augustus Bonifacius Ambrosius Aurelianus Antonius Pius et
Magnificus, dux, rex, tyrannus et Basileus Mediterranearum Partum,
subscribo." (J. R. R. Tolkien)

 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
nowhere6

External


Since: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 103



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:40 am
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien (more info?)

Linards Ticmanis wrote:

 > Ok, another thread on this one.
 >
 > 1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.

What about Sneezey, Sleepy, Grumpy, Happy, Doc, Bashful and Dopey?

Sorry. I just couldn't resist.

Bob Kolker<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
danleach1

External


Since: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 17



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:40 am
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Linards Ticmanis" <ticmanis RemoveThis @gmx.de> wrote in message
news:4230642d$0$1110$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net...
 > Ok, another thread on this one.
 >
 > 1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.
 > Reasons: There's honestly not 13 real fleshed out dwarf personalities in
 > the Book. Also it is less confusing for the "uninitiated" not to have
 > similar names so I chose the most fleshed out one from every
 > similarily-named group. Six dwarves makes the Hobbit No. 7, still a
 > "lucky number". Thorin needs no explanation. Balin and Gloin, because of
 > the LOTR connections.(And Balin also because of his well defined
 > personality.) Dori, because he is closest to the Hobbit in several
 > scenes. Bombur for comic relief -- with full license from the Author
 > this time. Maybe Kili instead of Fili, I don't remember who of them is
 > more active and I don't have an e-text to look this up quickly -- but
 > one of them needs to die defending Thorin. As long as you don't have the
 > cliché "seven dwarfs", I think reducing their number is perfectly
 > acceptable.

Id stick with all 13
 > 2.) It would be great if John Rhys-Davis could play Gloin and Orlando
 > Bloom could play Thranduil. Both are a bit older now, which fits
 > perfectly. Legolas could be visible in passing once or twice, just use
 > some bluescreen left over from the LOTR cutting floor. I wouldn't have
 > Aragorn, Arwen, or Gimli appearing - I think Arwen was in Lothlorien at
 > the time and the others are too young to just appear without comment;
 > and I wouldn't like an appearance "with comment" since they are not
 > important to the story. (don't remember if Gimli was even born at the
time).

I agree with JRD but not orlando, i do think he should cameo a legolas bit
in the elven kings halls tho
 > 3.) Hugo Weaving (sp?), the Sackville-Bagginses from the SEE (don't know
 > the actors' real names), and maybe Ian McKellen should be there -- but
 > only if they can get McKellen not to look much older than his grey
 > version looked anyway.

Ian McKellen is an absolute must
 > 4.) I honestly don't think Elijah Wood would make a good Bilbo. He just
 > doesn't look tough enough and I think he's still too young. I'd try
 > getting a new actor. Suggestions? I'm thinking of someone more along the
 > lines of the Deagol character from the ROTK film prologue.

Ian Holme with some young-looking makeup?
 > 5.) If any major scene has to be left out, I'd say drop Beorn if you
 > must. I think it is the least filmable chapter (the animals would be
 > hard to do without getting a caricature) and also doesn't add all that
 > much to Bilbo's character. You could quickly reprovision the group at
 > some small settlement of the Beornings or the Woodmen without having an
 > outstanding character among them. Next thing to drop would be Rivendell,
 > but that hurts already. Of course there are small thing which could go,
 > like the boating across the Mirkwood River (just have Bombur step into a
 > little brook or so).
 >
 > 6.) I don't think you can introduce a love interest into the plot
 > without totally changing it. Face it, there simply are no women in the
 > story to any meaningful extent (except for the spiders Smile. So don't.

Agreed
 >
 > 7.) I don't yet have a good idea on who should do Smaug's voice. An
 > actor that has played Mafia patriarchs or some such before could be good.
 >
 > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
 > important to get right. He should not be a caricature so the drama in
 > the end doesn't lose its power. But he should be over-serious in a fun
 > way. Maybe somebody who has played a goverment official or a master
 > craftsman of some sort before.
 >
 > 8.) Other important characters to be filled: The trolls, the Great
 > Orc(?), Bard, the Mayor.



Also, no one has mentioned this, but i think they could bring in some of the
stuff from the unfinished tales on the quest of erebor, just to flesh it out
and make it fit with LOTR more. And showing gandalf entering dol guldor,
finding that dwarf (whos name i cant remember) and discovering that the
necromancer is in fact sauron returned<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
Leon Trollski

External


Since: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: 8



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

 >
 > 1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.


Thirteen dwarves will not break the budget. Plus it takes thirteen to truly
overwhelm Bilbo's kitchen. Plus "eight birds in five fir trees" doesn't
have the same kick as "fifteen birds"

 > 2.) It would be great if John Rhys-Davis could play Gloin and Orlando
 > Bloom could play Thranduil. Both are a bit older now, which fits

 >
Harmless cameo, a quick flash that people can't be sure of, would add a
little fun.
Bloom can appear as Legolas at his father's side, say nothing and act
casual.

 > 3.) Hugo Weaving (sp?), the Sackville-Bagginses from the SEE (don't know


Gandalf doesn't have to be McKellan.

 > 4.) I honestly don't think Elijah Wood would make a good Bilbo. He just
 >

DEREK JACOBI

 >
 > 6.) I don't think you can introduce a love interest into the plot
 > without totally changing it. Face it, there simply are no women in the
 > story to any meaningful extent (except for the spiders Smile. So don't.
 >

Yes don't fuck with the plot. Unless you're Phillipo Boyens and naturally
have more brains in your little finger than JRRT, and are a greater
dramatist than William Shakespeare and Homer put together.

 > 7.) I don't yet have a good idea on who should do Smaug's voice. An
 > actor that has played Mafia patriarchs or some such before could be good.
 >

Leanord Nimoy or James Earl Jones.

 > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really


Brian blessed.

 > 8.) Other important characters to be filled: The trolls, the Great
 > Orc(?), Bard, the Mayor.
 >

Bard-Harrison Ford
Mayor-James Cromwell
Trolls-Mike Meyers, "Garth" from Wayne's world, and, ummmm. can't think of a
third.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
jsolinas

External


Since: May 15, 2004
Posts: 313



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien, others (more info?)

Linards Ticmanis wrote:

 > 1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.
 > Reasons: There's honestly not 13 real fleshed out dwarf personalities in
 > the Book. Also it is less confusing for the "uninitiated" not to have
 > similar names so I chose the most fleshed out one from every
 > similarily-named group. Six dwarves makes the Hobbit No. 7, still a
 > "lucky number". Thorin needs no explanation. Balin and Gloin, because of
 > the LOTR connections.(And Balin also because of his well defined
 > personality.) Dori, because he is closest to the Hobbit in several
 > scenes. Bombur for comic relief -- with full license from the Author
 > this time. Maybe Kili instead of Fili, I don't remember who of them is
 > more active and I don't have an e-text to look this up quickly -- but
 > one of them needs to die defending Thorin. As long as you don't have the
 > cliché "seven dwarfs", I think reducing their number is perfectly
 > acceptable.

My goodness, have you seen the reaction when a *small* change
is made to a Tolkien plot? It's scary to comtemplate the
level of outrage we'd see if they cut back to six dwarves!
I mean, even Disney used seven!

 > 2.) It would be great if John Rhys-Davis could play Gloin and Orlando
 > Bloom could play Thranduil.

The first ain't gonna happen because of Rhys-Davies' severe
allergy to the makeup. He's said he wouldn't have any face
left if he played any more Dwarves. Bloom is a definite
possibility although his price tag has gone up considerably.

 > I wouldn't have
 > Aragorn, Arwen, or Gimli appearing - I think Arwen was in Lothlorien at
 > the time and the others are too young to just appear without comment;

Um, are you suggesting that some little thing like book-Arwen
being in Lothlórien would stop PJ? Besides, we know that PJ
requires an action chick. Maybe we'll lose Beorn and have
Arwen lead our heroes to the edge of Mirkwood instead.

 > 3.) Hugo Weaving (sp?), the Sackville-Bagginses from the SEE (don't know
 > the actors' real names), and maybe Ian McKellen should be there -- but
 > only if they can get McKellen not to look much older than his grey
 > version looked anyway.

McKellen is apparently willing, which is crucial.


-- FotW

Reality is for those who cannot cope with Middle-earth.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
user304

External


Since: Oct 21, 2003
Posts: 212



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien (more info?)

Leon Trollski wrote:
 >
 >
<snip>

  > > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
 >
 > Brian blessed.
 >

I thought of him -- but decided he'd be much better as Beorn.

--
Odysseus<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
softrat

External


Since: Jan 31, 2004
Posts: 651



(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:18:53 GMT, Odysseus
<odysseus1479-at.DeleteThis@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:

 >Leon Trollski wrote:
  >>
  >>
 ><snip>
 >
   >> > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
  >>
  >> Brian blessed.
  >>
 >
 >I thought of him -- but decided he'd be much better as Beorn.


How about Jar-jar Binks?

the softrat
"Honi soit qui mal y pense."
mailto:softrat@pobox.com
--
I once played poker with tarot cards. I got a full house and
four people died.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
bob9

External


Since: Oct 11, 2004
Posts: 44



(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 8:09 am
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Odysseus" <odysseus1479-at.TakeThisOut@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote in message
news:4231000B.1B71D110@yahoo-dot.ca...
 > Leon Trollski wrote:
  > >
  > >
 > <snip>
 >
   > > > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
  > >
  > > Brian blessed.
  > >
 >
 > I thought of him -- but decided he'd be much better as Beorn.

Um 'Fly My Beorinings, Fly!'?

 >
 > --
 > Odysseus<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
Warrior of Rohan

External


Since: Feb 16, 2005
Posts: 6



(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 8:40 am
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien, others (more info?)

If they do a Hobbit film (we can only hope!) I think they will make a bit
more serious than the book makes it out to be, at least in the earlier
parts. This will make it fit better with what everyone say in the LoTR
films.

Everyone is used to a Dwarf (Gimli) kicking butt in the whole movie. Can't
imagine a bunch a dopey Dwarves running around like it sometimes seems to be
in the book. Of course they do get pretty tough at the end once they have
their treasure. Looking forward to seeing a whole army of Dwarves fighting
Orcs (Goblins).




"Flame of the West" <jsolinas.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:IrWdnbVH8rZfnqzfRVn-sA@comcast.com...
 > Linards Ticmanis wrote:
 >
  >> 1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.
  >> Reasons: There's honestly not 13 real fleshed out dwarf personalities in
  >> the Book. Also it is less confusing for the "uninitiated" not to have
  >> similar names so I chose the most fleshed out one from every
  >> similarily-named group. Six dwarves makes the Hobbit No. 7, still a
  >> "lucky number". Thorin needs no explanation. Balin and Gloin, because of
  >> the LOTR connections.(And Balin also because of his well defined
  >> personality.) Dori, because he is closest to the Hobbit in several
  >> scenes. Bombur for comic relief -- with full license from the Author
  >> this time. Maybe Kili instead of Fili, I don't remember who of them is
  >> more active and I don't have an e-text to look this up quickly -- but
  >> one of them needs to die defending Thorin. As long as you don't have the
  >> cliché "seven dwarfs", I think reducing their number is perfectly
  >> acceptable.
 >
 > My goodness, have you seen the reaction when a *small* change
 > is made to a Tolkien plot? It's scary to comtemplate the
 > level of outrage we'd see if they cut back to six dwarves!
 > I mean, even Disney used seven!
 >
  >> 2.) It would be great if John Rhys-Davis could play Gloin and Orlando
  >> Bloom could play Thranduil.
 >
 > The first ain't gonna happen because of Rhys-Davies' severe
 > allergy to the makeup. He's said he wouldn't have any face
 > left if he played any more Dwarves. Bloom is a definite
 > possibility although his price tag has gone up considerably.
 >
  >> I wouldn't have
  >> Aragorn, Arwen, or Gimli appearing - I think Arwen was in Lothlorien at
  >> the time and the others are too young to just appear without comment;
 >
 > Um, are you suggesting that some little thing like book-Arwen
 > being in Lothlórien would stop PJ? Besides, we know that PJ
 > requires an action chick. Maybe we'll lose Beorn and have
 > Arwen lead our heroes to the edge of Mirkwood instead.
 >
  >> 3.) Hugo Weaving (sp?), the Sackville-Bagginses from the SEE (don't know
  >> the actors' real names), and maybe Ian McKellen should be there -- but
  >> only if they can get McKellen not to look much older than his grey
  >> version looked anyway.
 >
 > McKellen is apparently willing, which is crucial.
 >
 >
 > -- FotW
 >
 > Reality is for those who cannot cope with Middle-earth.
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
Lee Burstow

External


Since: Mar 11, 2005
Posts: 1



(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hiya.

Personally there are a number of things I'm waiting to see in the film. For
a start Bilbo finding the ring for the first time (I know we've already seen
a little bit of that)and then having a riddle competition with Gollum.

I'll also be watching out for the Eagles saving the group from the Orcs in
the trees and of course the spider attacks.
Having spent a good few hours playing the Hobbit game on the Playstation the
spider section was always one of my favourites Smile

And of course the final battle at the end.

I'm sure that if PJ does do the film it'll be a classic. I have the cartoon
version of the film, but nothing beats real life form Smile

Lee




"Warrior of Rohan" <ajkjr.TakeThisOut@fuse.net> wrote in message
news:20050311074930.291$DN@news.newsreader.com...
 > If they do a Hobbit film (we can only hope!) I think they will make a bit
 > more serious than the book makes it out to be, at least in the earlier
 > parts. This will make it fit better with what everyone say in the LoTR
 > films.
 >
 > Everyone is used to a Dwarf (Gimli) kicking butt in the whole movie.
 > Can't imagine a bunch a dopey Dwarves running around like it sometimes
 > seems to be in the book. Of course they do get pretty tough at the end
 > once they have their treasure. Looking forward to seeing a whole army of
 > Dwarves fighting Orcs (Goblins).
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > "Flame of the West" <jsolinas.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
 > news:IrWdnbVH8rZfnqzfRVn-sA@comcast.com...
  >> Linards Ticmanis wrote:
  >>
   >>> 1.) Six dwarves are enough. Thorin, Balin, Dori, Gloin, Fili, Bombur.
   >>> Reasons: There's honestly not 13 real fleshed out dwarf personalities in
   >>> the Book. Also it is less confusing for the "uninitiated" not to have
   >>> similar names so I chose the most fleshed out one from every
   >>> similarily-named group. Six dwarves makes the Hobbit No. 7, still a
   >>> "lucky number". Thorin needs no explanation. Balin and Gloin, because of
   >>> the LOTR connections.(And Balin also because of his well defined
   >>> personality.) Dori, because he is closest to the Hobbit in several
   >>> scenes. Bombur for comic relief -- with full license from the Author
   >>> this time. Maybe Kili instead of Fili, I don't remember who of them is
   >>> more active and I don't have an e-text to look this up quickly -- but
   >>> one of them needs to die defending Thorin. As long as you don't have the
   >>> cliché "seven dwarfs", I think reducing their number is perfectly
   >>> acceptable.
  >>
  >> My goodness, have you seen the reaction when a *small* change
  >> is made to a Tolkien plot? It's scary to comtemplate the
  >> level of outrage we'd see if they cut back to six dwarves!
  >> I mean, even Disney used seven!
  >>
   >>> 2.) It would be great if John Rhys-Davis could play Gloin and Orlando
   >>> Bloom could play Thranduil.
  >>
  >> The first ain't gonna happen because of Rhys-Davies' severe
  >> allergy to the makeup. He's said he wouldn't have any face
  >> left if he played any more Dwarves. Bloom is a definite
  >> possibility although his price tag has gone up considerably.
  >>
   >>> I wouldn't have
   >>> Aragorn, Arwen, or Gimli appearing - I think Arwen was in Lothlorien at
   >>> the time and the others are too young to just appear without comment;
  >>
  >> Um, are you suggesting that some little thing like book-Arwen
  >> being in Lothlórien would stop PJ? Besides, we know that PJ
  >> requires an action chick. Maybe we'll lose Beorn and have
  >> Arwen lead our heroes to the edge of Mirkwood instead.
  >>
   >>> 3.) Hugo Weaving (sp?), the Sackville-Bagginses from the SEE (don't know
   >>> the actors' real names), and maybe Ian McKellen should be there -- but
   >>> only if they can get McKellen not to look much older than his grey
   >>> version looked anyway.
  >>
  >> McKellen is apparently willing, which is crucial.
  >>
  >>
  >> -- FotW
  >>
  >> Reality is for those who cannot cope with Middle-earth.
  >>
  >>
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
gorbag

External


Since: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 33



(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien (more info?)

"the softrat" <softrat DeleteThis @pobox.com> wrote in message
news:lre231pdlqdnuhn09hecpm88ruj5vn9i89@4ax.com...
 > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:18:53 GMT, Odysseus
 > <odysseus1479-at DeleteThis @yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
 >
  > >Leon Trollski wrote:
   > >>
   > >>
  > ><snip>
  > >
   > >> > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
   > >>
   > >> Brian blessed.
   > >>
  > >
  > >I thought of him -- but decided he'd be much better as Beorn.
 >
 >
 > How about Jar-jar Binks?

No, I don't think Brian Blessed would make a good Jar-jar.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
john25

External


Since: Jan 02, 2004
Posts: 110



(Msg. 12) Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Gorbag" <gorbag.TakeThisOut@invalid.acct> wrote in message
news:yKnYd.11$Du.2@bos-service2.ext.ray.com...
 >
 > "the softrat" <softrat.TakeThisOut@pobox.com> wrote in message
 > news:lre231pdlqdnuhn09hecpm88ruj5vn9i89@4ax.com...
  > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:18:53 GMT, Odysseus
  > > <odysseus1479-at.TakeThisOut@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
  > >
   > > >Leon Trollski wrote:
   > > >>
   > > >>
   > > ><snip>
   > > >
   > > >> > 8.) I'm not sure who would make a good Thorin. But this is really
   > > >>
   > > >> Brian blessed.
   > > >>
   > > >
   > > >I thought of him -- but decided he'd be much better as Beorn.
  > >
  > >
  > > How about Jar-jar Binks?
 >
 > No, I don't think Brian Blessed would make a good Jar-jar.
 >
He actually played Boss Nass.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
mtsquad

External


Since: Dec 05, 2004
Posts: 2



(Msg. 13) Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Hobbit film [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Linards Ticmanis" <ticmanis DeleteThis @gmx.de> wrote in message
news:4230642d$0$1110$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net...
 > Ok, another thread on this one.
 >
 > 7.) I don't yet have a good idea on who should do Smaug's voice. An
 > actor that has played Mafia patriarchs or some such before could be good.

Linda Hunt would be perfect (Carnivale, Desporado)<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Hobbit film 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Book Forums (Home) -> J.R.R. Tolkien All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]