TVL or QOTD

External Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 85

>I just have to ask,
>
>Was your original question in earnest, and you just happened to jump one
>someone who happened to expand too much on the subject at hand (the
>long-winded answer was to someone else, not YOU, by the way), or were you
>just trolling for someone to use your new putdowns on? To be honest, it
>looks like the latter to me and obviously a couple others who have so far
>replied to this thread.

I'd think you'd KNOW the answers if you actually really read the posts before
replying. This did start out as a question, but bazer couldn't respect my
question. He had to use my post for his stupid one. Which is fine, but it's
proper when changing the subject to change the subject line. By the speak of
how the post wasn't to me. First of all, I started the thread, and NONE of the
posts where to YOU.

>
>As to the irony (sad, sad irony) that in a literary fan group you would
>insist that you shouldn't be expected to actually read the books at all to
>find information ...

Why should I? I mean, if I had the free time to take a whole day out to read
two books that both 540 pages I would, but I have a life. People are shooting
me down for asking one simple question. Which is fine, but I've heard questions
that were less intelligent be asked and no one asy anything. I mean, if you
have a very simple question to ask about the plot when you know there is a
person, or group, you can ask who know the answer already, what's the point?
Next time anyone asks any question about something that happened that they
already read I'm going to reply, "READ THE BOOK AGAIN! That's what people told
me when I had a question."

>I don't mean to get involved

And you posted because...? Wow, gee, never knew you post NOT to get invovled.
My lord, ain't I dumber that dirt? The things in this group make me laugh.

>nor to criticize you unduly

Yes, but one remark makes you jump down my throat. That isn't unduly, correct?

>but that last
>remark drove me to it

Wow, gee, I hate people that can't take responsibility for their actions. I
didn't make you do anything, nor did my post. You, yourself, decided to get
invovled. It's probably because you're too nosey to stay out it. You said
bazers post wasn't to me, but none of the posts in this thread,m before this
one, were to you. Just take responsibility for the things you do. No need to
blame others, it rarely works.

Julie

External Since: Jul 10, 2003 Posts: 21

in article 20030902193555.14188.00000318 DeleteThis @mb-m18.aol.com, StatLover666 at
statlover666 DeleteThis @aol.com wrote on 9/2/03 7:35 PM:

  >> Too subtle for Ms. Smarter-Than-You'll-Ever-Hope-To-Be? Maybe
  >> save these messages and try reading through again when you're older.
  >>
  >> Josh
  >>
  >>
> Josh, do you have a life? Honestly, I only reply to your posts to see the epic
> of a reply you'll send. Maybe yoiu should get a life and stop being a
> hyprocrite, and the topic must be important to you if you MUST write back to
> my
> posts. That is stupid, and my time is worth something so I am going to move
> on.
> No hard feelings, right? I mean any adult would have dropped this before
> little
> Miss. need to grow up did, right? Oh, yeah, I'm stopping this and the younger
> one. Anyway, I'm over this. You, my dear, may beat and try to ride a dead
> horse
> if you so wish.
>
> Julie

Yes Julie, when all logic and reason fail you, shut your eyes, holler some
insults, and run away. Works every time.

FWIW, I have a fantastic life, and you are psycho.

Josh