Taking Candy from a Baby-Boomer

Hypocrite in Chief, Hillary has commanded, has declared that it is an insult
to the pride of the American public that they should have to hear about the
bitterness of the poor. Let them eat cake is the slogan of her campaign.

And what is that cake for the bourgeoisie but their false pride, their
conceit, their desire to have their pride but not have to eat it too, when
eating it is the one thing on the table they most especially have coming to
them.

That Hillary should claim to be champion of the pride of the poor, that she
is here like Rocky, out there tossing back shots of whisky, taking the
courage to protect the feelings of an armed dope pusher in the barrio
against having to hear about his guns, or any aspersion to his character
that might come with it . . .

Oh, she is good. Very good. She has even found the way to make a concern for
the poor from Obama's lips sound un-American, less than patriotic, and/or in
a word, "elitist".

With a talent for slander like that, she should be reporting for the
National Enquirer and not messing around with the small stuff of a bid for
the White House.

The Clintons know better than they know anything how to take advantage from
the downright feral workings of the herd mentality; they know how it is that
once a fully duped public has sunk its teeth into a lie so meaty and bloody
as this one, you will pay holy hell to try and get it away from them again;
not after they've savored a taste of it, all so nicely flavored as it is
with the choicest of their most savory conceits and spicy prejudices.

The Clintons are good. It's as if they had majored in this evil art at
college. That college was not Harvard or Yale, but the Institute of Dirty
Hardball, from which they graduated summa cum lousy at Little Rock.

How do you take a few sentences of perfectly innocent observations, to parse
and deconstruct them, and put them back together into something totally
other than what was meant? A little Derrida and Foucault might help, but you
still must have the talent for putting it over on the public--and how do you
do that?

Are you kidding? This public? Talk about taking candy from a baby boomer . .
..

http://whosenose.blogspot.com/2008/04/taking-candy-from-baby-boomer.html
--
JM


--

..............................................................
> Posted thru AtlantisNews - Explore EVERY Newsgroup <
> http://www.AtlantisNews.com -- Lightning Fast!!! <
> Access the Most Content * No Limits * Best Service <

"Just Me" <jpdm45 DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4804ee03$0$13884$88260bb3@news.atlantisnews.com...
> Hypocrite in Chief, Hillary has commanded, has declared that it is an
> insult to the pride of the American public that they should have to hear
> about the bitterness of the poor. Let them eat cake is the slogan of her
> campaign.
>
> And what is that cake for the bourgeoisie but their false pride, their
> conceit, their desire to have their pride but not have to eat it too, when
> eating it is the one thing on the table they most especially have coming
> to them.
>
> That Hillary should claim to be champion of the pride of the poor, that
> she is here like Rocky, out there tossing back shots of whisky, taking the
> courage to protect the feelings of an armed dope pusher in the barrio
> against having to hear about his guns, or any aspersion to his character
> that might come with it . . .
>
> Oh, she is good. Very good. She has even found the way to make a concern
> for the poor from Obama's lips sound un-American, less than patriotic,
> and/or in a word, "elitist".
>
> With a talent for slander like that, she should be reporting for the
> National Enquirer and not messing around with the small stuff of a bid for
> the White House.
>
> The Clintons know better than they know anything how to take advantage
> from the downright feral workings of the herd mentality; they know how it
> is that once a fully duped public has sunk its teeth into a lie so meaty
> and bloody as this one, you will pay holy hell to try and get it away from
> them again; not after they've savored a taste of it, all so nicely
> flavored as it is with the choicest of their most savory conceits and
> spicy prejudices.
>
> The Clintons are good. It's as if they had majored in this evil art at
> college. That college was not Harvard or Yale, but the Institute of Dirty
> Hardball, from which they graduated summa cum lousy at Little Rock.
>
> How do you take a few sentences of perfectly innocent observations, to
> parse and deconstruct them, and put them back together into something
> totally other than what was meant? A little Derrida and Foucault might
> help, but you still must have the talent for putting it over on the
> public--and how do you do that?
>
> Are you kidding? This public? Talk about taking candy from a baby boomer .
> . .
>
> http://whosenose.blogspot.com/2008/04/taking-candy-from-baby-boomer.html
> --
> JM

Hear! Hear! "Let them eat cock!" is her slogan.
http://img108.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc1027&image=04992_leather10...123_102

--CD