In article <9aPcb.925$Hx4.206683488@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
T Berk <"TBerk "@ sbcglobal . net> wrote:
> Seeing as how things tend to 'improve' over time I got to wondering how
> common it might be in the (near?) future that we might see organleggers
> or might we jump past it to a time when we can regrow limbs and/or
> organs (in a mason jar, on Funk & Wagnel's porch).
Growing your own spare parts is definitely the way to go, since it's the
perfect medical solution, and has greater 'market acceptance'. Growing a
new organ could actually be easier than regrowing a limb, since you'd do
it inside your own body, forming a second organ alongside the ailing one.
Studies with mechanical hearts have shown that the best strategy is to
leave the biological heart in place; relieved of the main load, it tends
to recover, and might even result in the mechanical one being removed.
With organs such as the brain/liver/kidneys etc, the process could be
even easier, since they're more amorphous. Just add extra quantities of
healthy material, and let the existing organ 'train' them into shape;
though of course this means doing the procedure sufficiently early.
Fortunately, the most life-threatening conditions are the easiest ones
to treat; while the trickier stuff, such as a new limb, is rarer. Yes,
this is all years in the future, but research would be greatly speeded
up if religious & moralist pressure groups can be sidelined.
Tennant Stuart
--
____ ____ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ____
(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family
)( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours
(__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Which is More Likely: Transplants or Regrown Spare Parts?