On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:30:45 GMT, (Alleigh) wrote:
>S
>
>P
>
>O
>
>I
>
>L
>
>E
>
>R
>
>
>
>W
>
>A
>
>R
>
>N
>
>I
>
>N
>
>G
>
>Okay someone explain to me why Cable is um Logan?
>That seems rather stupid. I mean okay mabye a grumpy old Logan coming
>back but he looks just like Nathan but is supposedly Logan.
Frankly, this is a much better turn of events than what I thought they
were going to do. I figured Kirkman would make Cable Jean and Logan's
kid or maybe Jean and Xavier's (which just seems sick).
As for why Cable looks nothing like Logan, it's answered right there
on the last page...a few decades with no healing factor...scars and
age make the difference. Although there is still a possibility that
the whole thing is some kind of red herring and Cable isn't Logan.
>> Stay informed about: Ultimate X-Men : Cable