No WMD in Iraq, so what?

On 7 Feb 2004 02:01:12 -0800, neo_80a.DeleteThis@hotmail.com (Thomas Anderson)
wrote:

>We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
> & secured our Oil supply.
>
> what do you want more
An admission from the president that it was a war for oil; then I'll
be happy.
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

"lsj7" <modus_ponens.RemoveThis@ifthenbut.coma> wrote in message
news:AQ2Vb.19966$qK3.2399@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> Thomas Anderson wrote:
> > We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
> > & secured our Oil supply.
> >
> > what do you want more
>
> Give us back the lives you have destroyed for no legal reason.
>
> --



And what about the lives Saddam took.












> lsj7
> Their ethics are a short summary of police ordinances: for them the
> most important thing is to be a useful member of the state, and to air
> their opinions in the club of an evening; they have never felt the
> homesickness for something unknown and far away, nor the depths which
> consists in being nothing at all. ___________Soren Kierkegaard
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

Harley W. Daugherty wrote:
> "lsj7" <modus_ponens.TakeThisOut@ifthenbut.coma> wrote in message
> news:AQ2Vb.19966$qK3.2399@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>>> We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
>>> & secured our Oil supply.
>>>
>>> what do you want more
>>
>> Give us back the lives you have destroyed for no legal reason.
>>
>> --
>
>
>
> And what about the lives Saddam took.

What about them? You want to extrapolate and invade the entire planet,
then? Saddam had no monopoly on ruling his people with policies you may not
agree with. But they are Iraqi woes....not our children's. They were for
Iraqi's to deal with, not the Army of the US and US taxpayers.

Internal politics of another sovereign state is not your business. Iraqi's
for Iraqi's. Do not put the ills of the world on the US citizen.




--

Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their
attention. .If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you
and I, and congress and Assemblies, Judges and governors, shall all
become wolves.

_________Jefferson to Carrington 1787

lsj7
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 14:05:40 GMT, "Harley W. Daugherty"
<harleyd.DeleteThis@nemonet.com> wrote:

>
>"lsj7" <modus_ponens.DeleteThis@ifthenbut.coma> wrote in message
>news:AQ2Vb.19966$qK3.2399@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>> > We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
>> > & secured our Oil supply.
>> >
>> > what do you want more
>>
>> Give us back the lives you have destroyed for no legal reason.
>>
>> --
>
>
>
>And what about the lives Saddam took.
>
Something tells me you wouldn't give a "Rats Ass" over some Iraq's
dying. Funny how you conservatives suddenly turned into bleeding heart
liberals when your Primary reason for going to war proved to be a lie.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> lsj7
>> Their ethics are a short summary of police ordinances: for them the
>> most important thing is to be a useful member of the state, and to air
>> their opinions in the club of an evening; they have never felt the
>> homesickness for something unknown and far away, nor the depths which
>> consists in being nothing at all. ___________Soren Kierkegaard
>>
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 08:41:20 -0600, "lsj7"
<modus_ponens.TakeThisOut@ifthenbut.coma> wrote:

>Harley W. Daugherty wrote:
>> "lsj7" <modus_ponens.TakeThisOut@ifthenbut.coma> wrote in message
>> news:AQ2Vb.19966$qK3.2399@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>>> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>>>> We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
>>>> & secured our Oil supply.
>>>>
>>>> what do you want more
>>>
>>> Give us back the lives you have destroyed for no legal reason.
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> And what about the lives Saddam took.
>
>What about them? You want to extrapolate and invade the entire planet,
>then? Saddam had no monopoly on ruling his people with policies you may not
>agree with. But they are Iraqi woes....not our children's. They were for
>Iraqi's to deal with, not the Army of the US and US taxpayers.
>
>Internal politics of another sovereign state is not your business. Iraqi's
>for Iraqi's. Do not put the ills of the world on the US citizen.


US troops died during the Gulf War when they kicked out Hussein.
To have allowed Hussein to defy the cease-fire agreements and
resolutions would be akin to spitting on their graves.

JD


"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)

"This time, I think the Americans are serious.
Bush is not Clinton. I think this is the end."
-Uday Hussein

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States
and to our allies."
Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean
Face the Nation
September 2002
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

neo_80a RemoveThis @hotmail.com (Thomas Anderson) wrote:

: & secured our Oil supply.

Huh?

You do know where we get our oil from, right? It's not Iraq, which
would currently have great trouble shipping appreciable quantities of
oil right now, given the current state of its infrastructure.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:23:54 GMT, Fred J. McCall
<fmccall RemoveThis @earthlink.net> wrote:

>neo_80a@hotmail.com (Thomas Anderson) wrote:
>
>: & secured our Oil supply.
>
>Huh?
>
>You do know where we get our oil from, right? It's not Iraq, which
>would currently have great trouble shipping appreciable quantities of
>oil right now, given the current state of its infrastructure.


These oil conspiracy nuts must not realize that the US only receives
about %15 or less of its oil supply from the middle east.


JD


"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)

"This time, I think the Americans are serious.
Bush is not Clinton. I think this is the end."
-Uday Hussein

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States
and to our allies."
Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean
Face the Nation
September 2002
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

beber <beber.RemoveThis@intergate.com> wrote:

:An admission from the president that it was a war for oil; then I'll
:be happy.

So the President lying would make you happy?
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

Julian D. <jules.TakeThisOut@ersatz.com> wrote:

:On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:23:54 GMT, Fred J. McCall
:<fmccall.TakeThisOut@earthlink.net> wrote:
:
:>neo_80a@hotmail.com (Thomas Anderson) wrote:
:>
:>: & secured our Oil supply.
:>
:>Huh?
:>
:>You do know where we get our oil from, right? It's not Iraq, which
:>would currently have great trouble shipping appreciable quantities of
:>oil right now, given the current state of its infrastructure.
:
:These oil conspiracy nuts must not realize that the US only receives
:about %15 or less of its oil supply from the middle east.

Right. If it was about oil, we would have invaded Canada. We get
much more oil from them, it's much closer, and the women are
friendlier.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

"lsj7" <modus_ponens DeleteThis @ifthenbut.coma> trolled:

>Saddam had no monopoly on ruling his people
> with policies you may not agree with.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Such a nice way of saying "...by torturing and killing anyone who disagreed
with him."
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

A President who tells the truth about important stuff

Secured our oil supply, you mean secured oil profits


"Thomas Anderson" <neo_80a DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:80455e19.0402070201.7681454c@posting.google.com...
> We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
> & secured our Oil supply.
>
> what do you want more
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

lsj7 wrote:
> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>
>>We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
>> & secured our Oil supply.
>>
>> what do you want more
>
>
> Give us back the lives you have destroyed for no legal reason.
>

Hey, Saddam should have listened We weren't messing around after 9/11.

Don't bother replying, either - you've been PLONKED.

--
Strategypage.com Contributor

"There is no way I'm backing out; I'll find an angel here somehow."
Jennifer Love Hewitt, "Avenue of the Stars"

"The only person who can kill your dream is yourself."
Tom Clancy, Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, August 10, 2003

Scott Podsednik was robbed.
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what? 

Harold Hutchison wrote:
> lsj7 wrote:
>> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> We freed Iraq, got rid of Saddam
>>> & secured our Oil supply.
>>>
>>> what do you want more
>>
>>
>> Give us back the lives you have destroyed for no legal reason.
>>
>
> Hey, Saddam should have listened We weren't messing around after
> 9/11.
>
> Don't bother replying, either - you've been PLONKED.

Prove you plonked me.

--

Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their
attention. .If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you
and I, and congress and Assemblies, Judges and governors, shall all
become wolves.

_________Jefferson to Carrington 1787

lsj7
 >> Stay informed about: No WMD in Iraq, so what?