New from Willows-Tree Press

On 13 Nov, 15:02, williemeikle <meiklewill... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 12 Nov, 23:05, Zarok <hauntedri... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > {Amusing pastiche snipped}
>
> > (I was bored!)
>
> So are we

Willy:

The royal 'we' would have at least had the grammatical know-how to end
a sentence with a full stop. However, there is acute irony in your
referring to anyone else's work as boring.

Z
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 13 Nov, 14:39, Zarok <hauntedri... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 Nov, 15:02, williemeikle <meiklewill... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12 Nov, 23:05, Zarok <hauntedri... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > {Amusing pastiche snipped}
>
> > > (I was bored!)
>
> > So are we
>
> Willy:
>
> The royal 'we' would have at least had the grammatical know-how to end
> a sentence with a full stop. However, there is acute irony in your
> referring to anyone else's work as boring.
>
> Z

Not when it's your work we're talking about Chris... it's never
anything but.
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 13 Nov, 20:30, williemeikle <meiklewill... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 13 Nov, 14:39, Zarok <hauntedri... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 13 Nov, 15:02, williemeikle <meiklewill... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 12 Nov, 23:05, Zarok <hauntedri... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > {Amusing pastiche snipped}
>
> > > > (I was bored!)
>
> > > So are we
>
> > Willy:
>
> > The royal 'we' would have at least had the grammatical know-how to end
> > a sentence with a full stop. However, there is acute irony in your
> > referring to anyone else's work as boring.
>
> > Z
>
> Not when it's your work we're talking about Chris... it's never
> anything but.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sure, Willy.

But by all means, please do post a link to anything you have written
which you believe to be any good. Let's see whether or not my belief
that you are a poor hack who churns out derivative, badly written
nonsense is valid.
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 06:56, Zarok <hauntedri... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 Nov, 20:30, williemeikle <meiklewill... RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 13 Nov, 14:39, Zarok <hauntedri... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 13 Nov, 15:02, williemeikle <meiklewill... RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 12 Nov, 23:05, Zarok <hauntedri... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > {Amusing pastiche snipped}
>
> > > > > (I was bored!)
>
> > > > So are we
>
> > > Willy:
>
> > > The royal 'we' would have at least had the grammatical know-how to end
> > > a sentence with a full stop. However, there is acute irony in your
> > > referring to anyone else's work as boring.
>
> > > Z
>
> > Not when it's your work we're talking about Chris... it's never
> > anything but.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Sure, Willy.
>
> But by all means, please do post a link to anything you have written
> which you believe to be any good. Let's see whether or not my belief
> that you are a poor hack who churns out derivative, badly written
> nonsense is valid.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
need a usenet kook to validate my existence

And what's with this Willy complex that you have? My name, as you well
know, is Willie. And if you find that funny, that just proves that
your mental age is exactly what I've always expected it to be.

Willie
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>

Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
others) to examine your own capabilities. Doing so might not be
necessary to validate your existence, but it would certainly go some
way to validating your competence as both a writer and critic.

> And what's with this Willy complex that you have? My name, as you well
> know, is Willie. And if you find that funny, that just proves that
> your mental age is exactly what I've always expected it to be.
>

The complex is obviously yours, Willy. The abbreviation Willy / Willie
can be spelt two ways, everybody knows that. If you find your name
that embarrassing you could always opt to change it by deed poll. I
understand that the forename Michael is available, which would give
your fuller name a certain tongue-twisting cachet.

As for being childish, well, I suppose that Margaret Thatcher must
have been childish too when as Prime Minister she said "Everyone
should have a Willy" (referring to her ministerial aide, William
Whitelaw).

Z
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 14:33, Zarok <hauntedri....DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> > and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> > You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> > need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>
> Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
> full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
> writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
> post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
> others) to examine your own capabilities. Doing so might not be
> necessary to validate your existence, but it would certainly go some
> way to validating your competence as both a writer and critic.
>
> > And what's with this Willy complex that you have?
>
> The complex is obviously yours, Willy. The abbreviation Willy / Willie
> can be spelt two ways, everybody knows that. If you find your name
> that embarrassing you could always opt to change it by deed poll. I
> understand that the forename Michael is available, which would give
> your fuller name a certain tongue-twisting cachet.
>
> As for being childish, well, I suppose that Margaret Thatcher must
> have been childish too when as Prime Minister she said "Everyone
> should have a Willy" (referring to her ministerial aide, William
> Whitelaw).
>
> Z

PS.

"My name, as you well know, is Willie. And if you find that funny,
that just proves that your mental age is exactly what I've always
expected it to be."

A curious Freudian slip this one. Either you do approach matters with
advance prejudice, or else your grasp of the English Language (how
those words must irritate the Scots!) is less than commanding. I
presume you meant to say "..what I've always suspected it to be."
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 11:33, Zarok <hauntedri....TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> > and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> > You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> > need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>
> Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
> full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
> writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
> post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
> others) to examine your own capabilities. Doing so might not be
> necessary to validate your existence, but it would certainly go some
> way to validating your competence as both a writer and critic.
>
> > And what's with this Willy complex that you have? My name, as you well
> > know, is Willie. And if you find that funny, that just proves that
> > your mental age is exactly what I've always expected it to be.
>
> The complex is obviously yours, Willy. The abbreviation Willy / Willie
> can be spelt two ways, everybody knows that. If you find your name
> that embarrassing you could always opt to change it by deed poll. I
> understand that the forename Michael is available, which would give
> your fuller name a certain tongue-twisting cachet.
>
> As for being childish, well, I suppose that Margaret Thatcher must
> have been childish too when as Prime Minister she said "Everyone
> should have a Willy" (referring to her ministerial aide, William
> Whitelaw).
>
> Z


<YAWN>

Whatever

</YAWN>
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 15:33, williemeikle <meiklewill....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov, 11:33, Zarok <hauntedri....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> > > and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> > > You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> > > need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>
> > Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
> > full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
> > writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
> > post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
> > others) to examine your own capabilities. Doing so might not be
> > necessary to validate your existence, but it would certainly go some
> > way to validating your competence as both a writer and critic.
>
> > > And what's with this Willy complex that you have? My name, as you well
> > > know, is Willie. And if you find that funny, that just proves that
> > > your mental age is exactly what I've always expected it to be.
>
> > The complex is obviously yours, Willy. The abbreviation Willy / Willie
> > can be spelt two ways, everybody knows that. If you find your name
> > that embarrassing you could always opt to change it by deed poll. I
> > understand that the forename Michael is available, which would give
> > your fuller name a certain tongue-twisting cachet.
>
> > As for being childish, well, I suppose that Margaret Thatcher must
> > have been childish too when as Prime Minister she said "Everyone
> > should have a Willy" (referring to her ministerial aide, William
> > Whitelaw).
>
> > Z
>
> <YAWN>
>
> Whatever
>
> </YAWN>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Willy:

Whenever someone proves you wrong or shows you up for a fool, you
either swear unpleasantly and storm off in a huff, or else feign
sudden boredom. It's as predictable as the limitations of your
intellect.

Z
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 14:41, Zarok <hauntedri....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov, 15:33, williemeikle <meiklewill....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 14 Nov, 11:33, Zarok <hauntedri....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> > > > and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> > > > You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> > > > need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>
> > > Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
> > > full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
> > > writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
> > > post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
> > > others) to examine your own capabilities. Doing so might not be
> > > necessary to validate your existence, but it would certainly go some
> > > way to validating your competence as both a writer and critic.
>
> > > > And what's with this Willy complex that you have? My name, as you well
> > > > know, is Willie. And if you find that funny, that just proves that
> > > > your mental age is exactly what I've always expected it to be.
>
> > > The complex is obviously yours, Willy. The abbreviation Willy / Willie
> > > can be spelt two ways, everybody knows that. If you find your name
> > > that embarrassing you could always opt to change it by deed poll. I
> > > understand that the forename Michael is available, which would give
> > > your fuller name a certain tongue-twisting cachet.
>
> > > As for being childish, well, I suppose that Margaret Thatcher must
> > > have been childish too when as Prime Minister she said "Everyone
> > > should have a Willy" (referring to her ministerial aide, William
> > > Whitelaw).
>
> > > Z
>
> > <YAWN>
>
> > Whatever
>
> > </YAWN>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Willy:
>
> Whenever someone proves you wrong or shows you up for a fool, you
> either swear unpleasantly and storm off in a huff, or else feign
> sudden boredom. It's as predictable as the limitations of your
> intellect.
>
> Z- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I haven't stormed off in a huff since I was three... that's more your
style.

I don't need to feign boredom as far as you're concerned.... it's real
enough.

And, no, my name isn't Willy, it's Willie. Shall I have my mother
confirm it to you?

Willie
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 11:33, Zarok <hauntedri....DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> > and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> > You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> > need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>
> Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
> full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
> writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
> post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
> others) to examine your own capabilities.

My writing is widely available for anybody that wants to find it. I'm
not at your beck and call you know.
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 17:55, williemeikle <meiklewill... RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> I haven't stormed off in a huff since I was three... that's more your
> style.
>

That's the extent of your witty rejoinder? A lame return to serve?

> I don't need to feign boredom as far as you're concerned.... it's real
> enough.
>
> And, no, my name isn't Willy, it's Willie. Shall I have my mother
> confirm it to you?
>

I always had you pegged as a Norman Bates type, Willy.
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 17:57, williemeikle <meiklewill....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 14 Nov, 11:33, Zarok <hauntedri....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 14 Nov, 13:31, williemeikle <meiklewill....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > I have many reviews that show that readers and critics like my work,
> > > and I sell my work consistently to professional markets.
> > > You don't like what I do, that's fine, I can live with that. I don't
> > > need a usenet kook to validate my existence
>
> > Erm, I'm not a usenet kook, Willy, I am a person who (like you) has a
> > full and busy life elsewhere. However, the question here is one of
> > writing talent, and you raised it, but you appear to be reluctant to
> > post a link to anything you have written which might enable me (or
> > others) to examine your own capabilities.
>
> My writing is widely available for anybody that wants to find it. I'm
> not at your beck and call you know.

For anybody 'who', Willy, for anybody 'who'.
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press 

On 14 Nov, 15:38, Zarok <hauntedri... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov, 17:55, williemeikle <meiklewill... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I haven't stormed off in a huff since I was three... that's more your
> > style.
>
> That's the extent of your witty rejoinder? A lame return to serve?
>
> > I don't need to feign boredom as far as you're concerned.... it's real
> > enough.
>
> > And, no, my name isn't Willy, it's Willie. Shall I have my mother
> > confirm it to you?
>
> I always had you pegged as a Norman Bates type, Willy.

Just make sure you have the doors firmly closed the next time you have
a shower
 >> Stay informed about: New from Willows-Tree Press