|
Related Topics:
| umm wolverine? - am i the only on in this group who has a great dis-like for aka logan, aka james? 1. I mean he had or has a bunch of women in his lives whom he loved very much and he has to mope around with "woe is me" bullshit. 2. He use to depend alot on..
Wolverine: The End - Is there any news when issue 6 is going to come out?, it's already what, 5 month late? Gerry
wolverine 147 - So i was doing some back reading. In this issue archangel wings and hair started to glow, and his wings could shoot energy and his hands could morph into claws. damn, i want to see more of this archangel in future x-men issues!
WOLVERINE: The End # 6 - SPOILERS .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I thought THE END was supposed to show death, but isn't that his brother that died at the end? Can someone help
Is Wolverine hot? - In of the Logan gets on Matt Murdock's case about how many women are always falling all over him, while Logan just scares and them. And here I always thought that Logan also had the chicks... So, let's hear it from those who..
|
|
|
Next: MI5 Persecution: Neil Fox (March/1998) (5229)
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Mar 08, 2004
Posts: 405
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:30 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>comics>marvel>xbooks (more info?)
|
|
|
The Black Guardian <blakgard.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in news:1190009727.287417.34540
@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com:
> Billy Bissette wrote:
>> Endangered Species has said:
>>
>> Mutants went from millions before M-Day to a couple hundred after.
>> (Others have claimed 198 was just the early government estimate,
>> but Endangered Species sets it as a real figure.)
>
> Even in "Endangered Species," it's not set as a real figure.
Beast says "two hundred," far enough after the fact that any updated
countings could have been made. His speech is about how far down
mutants have been brought, not how far down a government surveillance
program believed mutants to be immediately after the event.
>> The X-Gene was erased not just from living mutants, but from dead
>> mutants and genetic samples taken from mutants.
>
> The X-Gene was never said to have been erased from living mutants or
> dead mutants, just depowered mutants and samples. However, Pandemic
> seemed to have samples that were intact (they were destroyed in his
> battle with the X-Men).
In chapter 10, he checks into MGH. The dealer has a room stocked
with vials, all of which became inert after M-Day, with no trace of
mutant DNA. The dealer says he did have one stash that remained
active, and they were all from a mutant who had retained his powers.
Before he checked into MGH, he and Dark Beast checked corpses of
mutants (in Genosha?) I forget the chapter number of that one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jul 14, 2007
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:30 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Look again dummy! Initiaive #5, page 8, panel 2, Gyrich, off panel, his
EXACT words, 'We place the actual number at around 300. But only 198
have been calalouged.' After Constrictor asks Gyrich is when he says
Mutant 0 is 199. That mean that 199 to 300 are possible latents or are
workng undercover or other things. For securty reasons is why Gyrich
later says she doesn't exist. Do your research before you try to take me
on! I am a god (little 'g') of trivia! In my area people forfeit rather
than play me in radio trivia contests. I have wonevery local trivial
pursuit contest I have entered, I win free food and tickets from every
radio station every time it's legal for me to win! That's the advantage
of being old and the manager of a comic shop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 185
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:58 am
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Billy Bissette <baines.TakeThisOut@coastalnet.com> wrote in
news:Xns99AEC4C4A1576whatcholookinat@216.168.3.70:
> The comments about no new mutants being born is vague, and could
> mean either no one is manifesting powers, or it could mean that no one
> is even being born with an X-gene, or at least an enabled X-gene.
> (Endangered Species would imply that people aren't even being born
> with an X-gene anymore, considering it cannot be found in subjects
> and has even been removed from lab samples and corpses.)
This is where it all falls apart. How does anyone know if a baby is
born with an x-gene? Even Cerebro/a couldn't detect mutants until they
manifested their abilities. Why should it suddenly be possible to know
if every child born in the world has an x-gene at birth? I'd wager that
if one newborn is born a mutant then there must be others. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 185
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:03 am
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Tyval DeleteThis @webtv.net wrote in
news:8450-46EF155C-641@storefull-3131.bay.webtv.net:
> Look again dummy! Initiaive #5, page 8, panel 2, Gyrich, off panel,
> his EXACT words, 'We place the actual number at around 300. But only
> 198 have been calalouged.' After Constrictor asks Gyrich is when he
> says Mutant 0 is 199. That mean that 199 to 300 are possible latents
> or are workng undercover or other things. For securty reasons is why
> Gyrich later says she doesn't exist. Do your research before you try
> to take me on! I am a god (little 'g') of trivia! In my area people
> forfeit rather than play me in radio trivia contests. I have wonevery
> local trivial pursuit contest I have entered, I win free food and
> tickets from every radio station every time it's legal for me to win!
> That's the advantage of being old and the manager of a comic shop.
OK, I misread it as 200 or something. Just don't get upset about it. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 21, 2007
Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:03 am
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Don't worry about Tyval. I've known him on-line since '99. He's a
showoff! He's also damn good! I'm 50 and a 43 year reader of comic books
and I also worked in a comic book shop for 10 years and even I can't
beat him in trivia. He was just rubbing it in. He's not a bad guy when
you get to know him. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 08, 2004
Posts: 405
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:09 am
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Tyval DeleteThis @webtv.net wrote in news:8450-46EF155C-641@storefull-
3131.bay.webtv.net:
> Look again dummy! Initiaive #5, page 8, panel 2, Gyrich, off panel, his
> EXACT words, 'We place the actual number at around 300.
Fairly insulting tone, considering I didn't say you were wrong.
I said it is a contradiction with Endangered Species, which it is.
And that was my point. Marvel hasn't got the idea behind Decimation
straight between its various writers, editors, and other personel,
which leads to contradictory facts. (Not just confusion or characters
being wrong in-story, but stories effectively being written to
different "realities." >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 26
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:35 am
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<Tyval RemoveThis @webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8450-46EF155C-641@storefull-3131.bay.webtv.net...
>
> calalouged.
>
> I am a god (little 'g') of trivia!
But, alas, not of spelling, eh? 
D. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:28 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:58:00 +0000, Dan McEwen wrote:
> Billy Bissette <baines.DeleteThis@coastalnet.com> wrote in
> news:Xns99AEC4C4A1576whatcholookinat@216.168.3.70:
>
>> The comments about no new mutants being born is vague, and could
>> mean either no one is manifesting powers, or it could mean that no one
>> is even being born with an X-gene, or at least an enabled X-gene.
>> (Endangered Species would imply that people aren't even being born with
>> an X-gene anymore, considering it cannot be found in subjects and has
>> even been removed from lab samples and corpses.)
>
> This is where it all falls apart. How does anyone know if a baby is born
> with an x-gene? Even Cerebro/a couldn't detect mutants until they
> manifested their abilities. Why should it suddenly be possible to know if
> every child born in the world has an x-gene at birth? I'd wager that if
> one newborn is born a mutant then there must be others.
That bothered me too. I decided it might mean they could detect those few
mutants who were obviously mutants from birth -- like Nightcrawler was.
But really all that machine could detect was new manifestations of mutant
power. As far as I know, it couldn't detect the age of the mutant that was
getting their powers. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 185
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:35 am
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
vodar DeleteThis @webtv.net wrote in
news:9155-46EF3BC0-662@storefull-3132.bay.webtv.net:
> Don't worry about Tyval. I've known him on-line since '99. He's a
> showoff! He's also damn good! I'm 50 and a 43 year reader of comic
> books and I also worked in a comic book shop for 10 years and even I
> can't beat him in trivia. He was just rubbing it in. He's not a bad
> guy when you get to know him.
I'm not worried, I just thought he took it a little too seriously. I
have enough drama with teenagers in a classroom so I don't look for it
here. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 02, 2004
Posts: 330
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:50 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
and thus Dan McEwen inscribed ...
> vodar RemoveThis @webtv.net wrote in
>> Don't worry about Tyval. I've known him on-line since '99. He's a
>> showoff! He's also damn good! I'm 50 and a 43 year reader of comic
>> books and I also worked in a comic book shop for 10 years and even I
>> can't beat him in trivia. He was just rubbing it in. He's not a bad
>> guy when you get to know him.
> I'm not worried, I just thought he took it a little too seriously. I
> have enough drama with teenagers in a classroom so I don't look for it
> here.
don't stand so close ...
--
"... respect, all good works are not done by only good folk. For here, at the end of all things, we shall do what needs to be done."
--till next time, Jameson Stalanthas Yu -x- <<poetry.dolphins-cove.com>> >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 185
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:08 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
~consul <consul.DeleteThis@INVALIDdolphins-cove.com> wrote in
news:fcuiv1$dns$1@gist.usc.edu:
> and thus Dan McEwen inscribed ...
>> vodar.DeleteThis@webtv.net wrote in
>>> Don't worry about Tyval. I've known him on-line since '99. He's a
>>> showoff! He's also damn good! I'm 50 and a 43 year reader of comic
>>> books and I also worked in a comic book shop for 10 years and even I
>>> can't beat him in trivia. He was just rubbing it in. He's not a bad
>>> guy when you get to know him.
>> I'm not worried, I just thought he took it a little too seriously. I
>> have enough drama with teenagers in a classroom so I don't look for
>> it here.
>
> don't stand so close ...
Why, are you in my class?  No, don't worry. I know better. >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 21
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:20 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>comics>marvel>xbooks, others (more info?)
|
|
|
~consul wrote in message ...
>
>don't stand so close ...
>--
what are you, The Police or something?
mk5000
"My pastor thinks it quixotic: can’t get him to sign off at laudes prior to morning Mass, although the Lent/Easter cycle we did pray
it MP was well-received.
Know of a number of parishioners who pray MP and EP, but not of any families. A few others use “Magnificat” magazine’s abbreviated
version for self and family: a little easier with the little ones in the home."--father michael >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 21
|
(Msg. 28) Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:36 pm
Post subject: Re: New Wolverine Look [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dan McEwen wrote in message ...
>
>This is where it all falls apart. How does anyone know if a baby is
>born with an x-gene? Even Cerebro/a couldn't detect mutants until they
>manifested their abilities. Why should it suddenly be possible to know
>if every child born in the world has an x-gene at birth? I'd wager that
>if one newborn is born a mutant then there must be others.
>
maybe it's like horoscopes. also, what if one kid is an aries. and another is born same time and place, will their horoscopes be
the same
this is just a little test to say hi, of course, but to see if the huge
retrograde that has been my life for all this recent time is abating. so i
am testing this email account, in a symbolic sense, one check just before
this nation sinks into a fascist morass...
you might now consider
investing in a good coon hound. keep that gosh darn varmint at bay.
peace and carats
mk5000
"Select() tells you that at the time it returned the socket
would not block, but that does not guarantee that it will not block even if you immediately call write() after select(). This is a
common
misconception that bites many new socket programmers."--phil frisbie jr >> Stay informed about: New Wolverine Look |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
