Don Tuite <don_tuite RemoveThis @REMOVETHIShotlink.com> wrote in message news:<a47d10l6a8pjsb3fet9jmh57jbolipisj5 RemoveThis @4ax.com>...
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:02:25 -0500, "Don Phillipson"
> <nospam RemoveThis @nospam.trytel.com> wrote:
>
> >"Aly" <twistedangel_23 RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:69e0ff98.0401252225.38071811@posting.google.com...
> >
> >> Could someone please explain this to me? (That is, if it even is
> >> explainable).
> >
> >The earliest known art includes statues (imitations
> >of people) and poetic sagas (imitations of battles,
> >love stories etc. cf. Aristotle.) The plastic arts (e.g. pictures)
> >have been realistic (representational) for most of
> >their history.
>
> Isn;t this like asking what "dog bites man" means?
Good analogy. To be more informative rather than obliquely sarcastic,
the original expression was "Life Imitates Art", which meant to refer
to the counterintuitive instance where something that was formerly
thought to be a contrivance of literature or storytelling pops up in
reality as if torn from the pages of the book. It was a challenge to
the conventional view of the universe.
Eventually, the phrase became so common, that REVERSING it became more
of a challenge, and people started using the phrase "Art imitates
Life" as a clever reversal of the cliche, so it's kind of a
double-irony that arrives full-circle at the conventional wisdom that
fantasy mimicks reality, only makes it seem like an unexpected twist.
DB.
>> Stay informed about: What exactly does 'art imitates life' mean?