charles krin <ckrin.RemoveThis@bayou.com> writes:
>LOL..yeah...have seen that too...like the first time a WO1 had to shot
>an autorotation from the right seat with a full load on...we had one
>of our high time (15K plus hours in Hueys alone) IPs riding
>shotgun...but it was my first autorotation to touch down and I'll tell
>you what...a Huey in auto is a spooky quiet bird...
*Any* aircraft that's designed to be under power at all times is
a spooky place when the noisemaker is turned off.
Interesting statistic:
* On an accidents-per-registered aircraft, single-engine airplanes
are more likely to have an engine failure related accident than
are multiengine airplanes.
* Of the airplanes that have engine failure related accidents, the
rate of fatal accidents is significantly higher in multi-engine
airplanes than in signle-engine birds.
The best explanation for this is that when you have an engine failure
in a single-engine airplane (and I've been there...) there isn't any
question: you're about to make some type of landing in the near
future. If you're in a twin, you're likely to try to keep going
despite the fact that losing one engine in a twin costs you a huge
part of your performance, in some cases exceeding 100%.
To give an idea of the problem, the twin in which I took my multiengine
checkride (in 1973) on a standard (relatively cool) day and loaded
to gross weight can maintain an altitude of only 3600' MSL if one
engine fails and *everything* is working as it should.
Joe Morris<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: another blonde bombshell