 |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 12, 2003 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 3:50 am
Post subject: something Archived from groups: alt>startrek>books (more info?)
|
|
|
I get saddened when I see fans taking the trouble to write and tell the
world that Enterprise is bad, embarassing, blah blah etc. I mean, don't
watch. If someone doesn't like a TV show, they usually don't watch it.
Personally, I don't see what the fuss is all about. Enterprise is taking a
different direction than the other series', but that doesn't make it bad.
Diversity in infinite combinations, remember? Sure, Berman and Braga should
have taken a year off after Voyager to pen some more original ideas, but
considering each story has to fit in and not contradict the previous 4
series before, I think the writers have done an ok job.
And remember - it's only season 3. The other shows didn't start getting
good until at least season 3 or 4. >> Stay informed about: something |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 30, 2003 Posts: 31
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 3:50 am
Post subject: Re: something [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <3f88a537.DeleteThis@news.comindico.com.au>, amylil
<amylil.DeleteThis@dodo.com.au> wrote:
> I get saddened when I see fans taking the trouble to write and tell the
> world that Enterprise is bad, embarassing, blah blah etc. I mean, don't
> watch. If someone doesn't like a TV show, they usually don't watch it.
>
> Personally, I don't see what the fuss is all about. Enterprise is taking a
> different direction than the other series', but that doesn't make it bad.
> Diversity in infinite combinations, remember? Sure, Berman and Braga should
> have taken a year off after Voyager to pen some more original ideas, but
> considering each story has to fit in and not contradict the previous 4
> series before, I think the writers have done an ok job.
>
> And remember - it's only season 3. The other shows didn't start getting
> good until at least season 3 or 4.
Classic was good from the very start, and many think its first season
was its best. I agree that TNG needed a few years to get going, but
that was only the second time they'd tried to do Trek. ST:E is the
*fifth*. You'd think that, by now, they'd have gotten it right.
People aren't watching ST:E, which is the problem. This reboot started
stupidly, and it hasn't been going anywhere. I mean, these aliens have
a secret weapon to destroy Earth, but they have to test it first, so
they test it on ... Earth? And alert everybody to the danger? How
freaking *dumb*!!! But they had to motivate the Earthlings to go in
the Expanse or whatever it is, so that's the way they did it. Dumb,
dumb, dumb. Man, it's just not worth going on.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: something |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 30, 2003 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:43 pm
Post subject: Re: something [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
You have missed the point. Enterprise has too many anomalies.
Long term fans get twitchy when trek history gets changed.
DMC
"amylil" <amylil DeleteThis @dodo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f88a537@news.comindico.com.au...
> I get saddened when I see fans taking the trouble to write and tell the
> world that Enterprise is bad, embarassing, blah blah etc. I mean, don't
> watch. If someone doesn't like a TV show, they usually don't watch it.
>
> Personally, I don't see what the fuss is all about. Enterprise is taking
a
> different direction than the other series', but that doesn't make it bad.
> Diversity in infinite combinations, remember? Sure, Berman and Braga
should
> have taken a year off after Voyager to pen some more original ideas, but
> considering each story has to fit in and not contradict the previous 4
> series before, I think the writers have done an ok job.
>
> And remember - it's only season 3. The other shows didn't start getting
> good until at least season 3 or 4.
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: something |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 27, 2003 Posts: 23
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 12:56 pm
Post subject: Re: something [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
amylil wrote:
>
> Enterprise is taking a different direction than the other series',
> but that doesn't make it bad.
The stories are bad, the writing is bad, the acting is bad. The premise,
imo, is horrible.
Nobody is watching the show, for these reasons and others.
Craig J. Ries<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: something |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 10, 2003 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 1:03 pm
Post subject: Re: something [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Ah, but T'Pol - hot hot hot
"Craig J. Ries" <silvanthalas_cjr RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3F8C1CB8.E0D429E9@comcast.net...
> amylil wrote:
> >
> > Enterprise is taking a different direction than the other series',
> > but that doesn't make it bad.
>
> The stories are bad, the writing is bad, the acting is bad. The premise,
> imo, is horrible.
>
> Nobody is watching the show, for these reasons and others.
>
> Craig J. Ries<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: something |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|