why was Barker dissatisfied with Candyman?

"Evil Sponge" <suck-on-mine.TakeThisOut@spam-bitches.com> wrote in message news:<bh04aa$bdi$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>...
 > "John Doe" <none.TakeThisOut@none.no> wrote in message
 > news:O_GYa.12042$os2.177181@news2.e.nsc.no...
<font color=green>  > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.philipglass.com/candyman.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.philipglass.com/candyman.html</font</a>>
  > >
  > > never found any other info about this..

In truth, Clive wasn't disappointed with it. But he was certainly
disappointed in those liner notes you refer to. Not only did the
author refer to him as "Clive Barnes" (twice, no less), a mistake
they've since corrected online, but, well, let Clive tell it:

[Re. release of Philip Glass's Candyman score on CD] "...with the most
erroneous set of liner notes you can imagine. I mean, I couldn't care
less if my name was right, but what really annoys me is this guy,
whoever he is - I hope he reads this - this guy had the temerity to
imply that Bernard Rose was fired off Candyman and didn't get to
finish the movie the way he wanted to finish it!
"This guy - I don't know who he is, if he's a friend of Philip's or,
what the heck - says Philip was apparently very disappointed with the
movie because of the notes going on and it was being fiddled around
with and it wasn't what Bernard wanted and all. Well, Philip went on
to score the sequel. I don't know what the guy is talking about, but
it really irritates me when people pontificate from a place of
ignorance. But it is nice to have the music finally. It's wonderful
music."

Robert (thanks to the "Clive Barker: Revelations" site.)<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: why was Barker dissatisfied with Candyman? 

hmm.. great. I too couldn't imagine why anyone would be dissatisfied with
Candyman


"Robert" <rgetz.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a7548e2d.0308141146.55c28114@posting.google.com...
 > "Evil Sponge" <suck-on-mine.RemoveThis@spam-bitches.com> wrote in message
news:<bh04aa$bdi$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>...
  > > "John Doe" <none.RemoveThis@none.no> wrote in message
  > > news:O_GYa.12042$os2.177181@news2.e.nsc.no...
<font color=brown>   > > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.philipglass.com/candyman.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.philipglass.com/candyman.html</font</a>>
   > > >
   > > > never found any other info about this..
 >
 > In truth, Clive wasn't disappointed with it. But he was certainly
 > disappointed in those liner notes you refer to. Not only did the
 > author refer to him as "Clive Barnes" (twice, no less), a mistake
 > they've since corrected online, but, well, let Clive tell it:
 >
 > [Re. release of Philip Glass's Candyman score on CD] "...with the most
 > erroneous set of liner notes you can imagine. I mean, I couldn't care
 > less if my name was right, but what really annoys me is this guy,
 > whoever he is - I hope he reads this - this guy had the temerity to
 > imply that Bernard Rose was fired off Candyman and didn't get to
 > finish the movie the way he wanted to finish it!
 > "This guy - I don't know who he is, if he's a friend of Philip's or,
 > what the heck - says Philip was apparently very disappointed with the
 > movie because of the notes going on and it was being fiddled around
 > with and it wasn't what Bernard wanted and all. Well, Philip went on
 > to score the sequel. I don't know what the guy is talking about, but
 > it really irritates me when people pontificate from a place of
 > ignorance. But it is nice to have the music finally. It's wonderful
 > music."
 >
 > Robert (thanks to the "Clive Barker: Revelations" site.)<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: why was Barker dissatisfied with Candyman?