explain your stance, compadre...

>Richmond is a spaz.


i found this remark to be wide of the mark to say the least. explain
your stance por favor. have known richmond since late 70s and he's
always been quite the gentleman according to my standards, as well as a
good friend and a noble laureate.

additionally, he's produced some of the better poetry of the ages,
anywhere, as far as i have seen (see: Earth).

it's a shame this icon hasn't been recognized in the national registry.


that guy

That Guy wrote:
> >Richmond is a spaz.
>
>
> i found this remark to be wide of the mark to say the least. explain
> your stance por favor. have known richmond since late 70s and he's
> always been quite the gentleman according to my standards, as well as a
> good friend and a noble laureate.
>
> additionally, he's produced some of the better poetry of the ages,
> anywhere, as far as i have seen (see: Earth).
>
> it's a shame this icon hasn't been recognized in the national registry.
>
>
> that guy

**

How do you account for the ludicrous (and then disavowed) reviews of
his own work on Amazon?

Have you seen his loony interview in that recent Buk bio?

He's a rentier. An idler. A flaneur and a trust fund baby.