Welcome to BookBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose?

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12, 13, 14
   Book Forums (Home) -> David Weber RSS
Related Topics:
One Manticore's need for Competent Officers - Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but wrote on Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:06:25 -0500 in : > >> In the first round of the resumed war, the new tactics and weapons, >> by ONI, combined with..

How things stand: Haven/Manticore - I was the last book, and just finished Crown of Slaves. Someone correct me here. As War of Honor closed we knew the More than half the new ships that Haven posessed were at Trevor's Star, yes? And they were easily by..

Some thoughts on the analysis of the Battle of Manticore - Some thoughts on the analysis of the Battle of Manticore But first, a quick note: === chapter 65 index 6764 ==== Even now, no one on either side knew exactly what would happen when fleets of this size engaged one another. There was simply no..

Government hierarchy of the Star Empire of Manticore - While rereading the entire series, I can't help but wonder about what sort of hierarchy will come into existence once Silesia and Talbott are fully into the Star Kingdom. It seems to me that the most..

The Talbot Cluster Becoming part of Manticore makes no sen.. - It makes about as much sense as every South American country suddenly deciding that it wants to be part of Canada, to protect from American just because Air Canada suddenly started offering direct flights between Toronto and Rio..
Author Message
Quadibloc

External


Since: Apr 19, 2007
Posts: 33



(Msg. 46) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:27 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>books>david-weber (more info?)

On Feb 13, 7:28 pm, Loren Pechtel <lorenpech... RemoveThis @hotmail.invalid.com>
wrote:

> Sure you can put the base out there but how are you going to hide the
> electronic emissions?

Electronic emissions only travel at the speed of light. Plan to build
your space armada in less than 1000 years, and locate your mega-
Bolthole more than 1000 light-years away from anywhere.

John Savard

 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Quadibloc

External


Since: Apr 19, 2007
Posts: 33



(Msg. 47) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:25 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 7, 5:11 pm, Willowhugger <charlie_the_cat_po....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> actually, I don't think I could take Manticore seriously if they lost
> to the Solarians. They've been pretty much established by David Weber
> as having the worst ships in the universe at this point. Personally,
> I also think the Havenites have a right for payback.

It's been pretty well established in the last two books that the
"real" war isn't between Haven and Manticore at all. Instead, Mesa is
manipulating things behind the scenes to keep this war continuing.

So what annoys me is that Manticore and Haven are being played for
fools for so long. It's time for Manticore's leadership to see through
this plot, and for Haven to stop doing really stupid things - "since
we can't convince Manticore that this is all a Mesan provocation,
let's just administer Manticore a crushing defeat through a sneak
attack. Never mind that this has *never* worked before, and is
unlikely to ever work in future as long as Honor Harrington still
draws breath..."

No; if Haven does this for a third time in a row, but this time
instead of getting its tail kicked at the end of the book, administers
a setback to Manticore to drag it out *still* longer... it would be a
sign that David Weber is getting bored, and is just cranking out the
space battles to rake in the money. The quality of the previous books
in the series makes that unlikely.

Crown of Slaves and Shadow of Saganami have provided lots of setup -
and there's going to be a *third* book in that series before the next
main-line Honor Harrington book. (Even before that, it's been noted
here that the next Honorverse book is another short story collection.)

The next book may still have to *open* in the context of Haven vs
Manticore, since the turn-around from that hasn't happened yet. But
switching to the real war is long overdue.

First, the evidence of Mesa being behind everything has to percolate
out. Manticore had suppressed the role of Frontier Security in the
difficulties surrounding the new Junction terminus because FS is too
dangerous an enemy, able to mobilize the Solarian League against
Manticore. But FS can be used as Mesa's tool.

So Manticore and Haven declare peace, and start going after Mesa.

Mesa fights back - by using FS to manufacture an incident, and pull
the Solarian League into a war against Manticore and Haven together.

These are the *obvious* developments; David Weber, of course, may have
a few less-than-obvious twists up his sleeve.

Mesa, of course, doesn't care so much whether the Solarian League or
Manticore/Haven wins, as long as the victory is Pyrrhic. Actually,
that's an oversimplification. Even a Pyrrhic victory by Manticore over
the Solarian League is very bad for Mesa, because they lose their best
customers, and the place to spend their money - and, in the long run,
Manticore gains Solaria's advanced technology. But if Mesa is
*reacting* in panic to defend its survival against Manticore, it won't
have the luxury of thinking about the odds and the long term.

If Mesa had the luxury of a long amount of preparation time to set up
for an attack on Manticore by the Solarian League, then they would
have their agents in FS and the Solarian government urge the Solarian
League to build a gigantic fleet in secret to overwhelm every
Manticoran system at once. But that won't happen, fortunately.

Still, with Mesa being the only real enemy, and the Solarian League
being potentially a much more dangerous enemy, this is obviously the
way to go for an exciting book about a fight for high and meaningful
stakes. And Manticore will need to suffer temporary multi-book
setbacks, if only because the ultimate victory over the Solarians and
Mesa would make everything after an anti-climax.

The overthrow of the Peeps, of course, didn't end the Manticore-Haven
conflict, and so victory over the Solarians could degenerate into
renewed conflict, but I think the first Solarian League/Manticore war
should be a multi-novel arc larger than the two previous ones in the
series (with midpoints Flag in Exile and In Enemy Hands).

The Solarians conquer Manticore, Grayson, and Haven; Honor Harrington,
though, is at large on some tiny backwards planet in Silesia... and
winds up building a fleet there to liberate the Galaxy! Since this is
clearly impossible, it will take even Honor a bit longer than one
book.

John Savard

 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Loren Pechtel

External


Since: Aug 10, 2006
Posts: 365



(Msg. 48) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:03 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:53:23 -0500, Don Sample <dsample DeleteThis @synapse.net>
wrote:

>> Sure you can put the base out there but how are you going to hide the
>> electronic emissions?
>
>You put it out around some star that doesn't have any inhabited systems.
>There are tens of thousands of those in Solarian space.
>
>Or if you insist on sticking it in an inhabited one, the Sollies are
>already leaders in stealth technology. And what's to distinguish the
>electronic emissions of a yard making warships, from one building
>commercial cargo ships, or an asteroid mining operation, or any one of a
>dozen other things.

But it's a *BIG* facility. The observers would come have a look to
see what's going on.
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Loren Pechtel

External


Since: Aug 10, 2006
Posts: 365



(Msg. 49) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:03 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500, Don Sample <dsample.TakeThisOut@synapse.net>
wrote:

>> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
>> systems. That could be a problem, though...
>
>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)

I got to thinking on this--how well can ships locate a point in deep
space?
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
phamp

External


Since: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 390



(Msg. 50) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Don Sample
<dsample.DeleteThis@synapse.net> wrote on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:53:23 -0500 in
alt.books.david-weber :
>In article <47b3a748$0$10277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
> Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel.DeleteThis@hotmail.invalid.com> wrote:
>> >> How many observers per world do you need? All you need to look for is
>> >> shipyards capable of constructing large vessels. Those are large
>> >> spacegoing structures.
>> >
>> >Which don't actually have to be very close to any inhabited world. You
>> >can stick them out in the boondocks where no one ever goes. The
>> >Solarian League has got nearly two thousand inhabited member systems,
>> >and countless uninhabited systems inside their sphere in influence.
>> >
>> > "Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely,
>> > mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a
>> > long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just
>> > peanuts to space."
>> >
>> > -- Douglas Adams
>>
>> Sure you can put the base out there but how are you going to hide the
>> electronic emissions?
>
>You put it out around some star that doesn't have any inhabited systems.
>There are tens of thousands of those in Solarian space.
>
>Or if you insist on sticking it in an inhabited one, the Sollies are
>already leaders in stealth technology. And what's to distinguish the
>electronic emissions of a yard making warships, from one building
>commercial cargo ships, or an asteroid mining operation, or any one of a
>dozen other things.

As has been pointed out, if it is off the beaten track, who is
going to know that it is there? Bolthole, Cerebus, Area 51, Hanford,
Dugway, Los Alamos, Benchley Park, etc, were all put "out of the way"
where traffic is low to non-existent. So a Sollie "Bolthole" just has
to be off the travel routes, or at an non-inhabited system. Preferably
one with mineral resources available, but that does not mean a
habitable planet.


--
pyotr filipivich
The two oldest cliches in the book are "The Good Old Days were
better." and "After all, these are Modern TImes."
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
phamp

External


Since: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 390



(Msg. 51) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Don Sample
<dsample.DeleteThis@synapse.net> wrote on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500 in
alt.books.david-weber :
>In article <47b3a748$1$10277$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
> Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel.DeleteThis@hotmail.invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:30:53 GMT, Brian McDonald
>> <Brian_knowspam.McDonald.DeleteThis@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:48:39 -0800, Loren Pechtel
>> ><lorenpechtel.DeleteThis@hotmail.invalid.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >Yeah, they "surrender" but then they start their own version of
>> >>>> >Bolthole, only a hundred times over, and a few years later they drop
>> >>>> >their own hammer on Manticore.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> And they're going to be able to pull it off? After they surrender
>> >>>> Manticore will certainly insist on observers.
>> >>>
>> >>>How many observers will it take to keep a watch on thousands of worlds?
>> >>>Manticore doesn't have that many people.
>> >>
>> >>How many observers per world do you need? All you need to look for is
>> >>shipyards capable of constructing large vessels. Those are large
>> >>spacegoing structures.
>> >
>> >even if you visited every wretched system the sollies have mapped it
>> >would be simple enough to build a dozen boltholes in unmapped systems
>> >or even in the empty spaces tween systems.
>> >
>> >one thing the sollies truly have is resources to work with.
>>
>> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
>> systems. That could be a problem, though...
>
>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)

Where there are stars, there are planets. And where there are
planets, there are humans. And where there are humans, there are
bars.

tschus
pyotr


--
pyotr filipivich
The two oldest cliches in the book are "The Good Old Days were
better." and "After all, these are Modern TImes."
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Taki Kogoma

External


Since: Oct 06, 2007
Posts: 8



(Msg. 52) Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2008-02-14, Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel.TakeThisOut@hotmail.invalid.com>
allegedly proclaimed to alt.books.david-weber:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500, Don Sample <dsample.TakeThisOut@synapse.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
>>> systems. That could be a problem, though...
>>
>>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)
>
> I got to thinking on this--how well can ships locate a point in deep
> space?

That was my thoughtt as well; how closely does hyperspace map to the
Real Universe[(tm) Pat. Pend.]?

--
Capt. Gym Z. Quirk (Known to some as Taki Kogoma) quirk @ swcp.com
Just an article detector on the Information Supercollider.
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
dsample

External


Since: Jul 01, 2004
Posts: 284



(Msg. 53) Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <47b490a1$1$10316$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel DeleteThis @hotmail.invalid.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500, Don Sample <dsample DeleteThis @synapse.net>
> wrote:
>
> >> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
> >> systems. That could be a problem, though...
> >
> >Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
> >on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
> >rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)
>
> I got to thinking on this--how well can ships locate a point in deep
> space?

Triangulation off the nearest stars should be able to fix you pretty
accurately, within a few light seconds, even with current tech: close
enough for radar to guide you in the rest of the way. We've had
instances of ships after a long trip in hyper dropping into normal space
to get a fix on their locations, before taking the final leg of their
journey when precise navigation was important.

In "Echos of Honor" the Peeps wanted to drop out of hyperspace within 5
million kms of the Basilisk terminus, or 16 light seconds, so they had
transitioned to normal space a couple of light months out to get a fix
on their location.

--
Quando omni flunkus moritati
Visit the Buffy Body Count at <http://homepage.mac.com/dsample/>
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian McDonald

External


Since: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 243



(Msg. 54) Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:59 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:28:08 -0800, Loren Pechtel
<lorenpechtel.TakeThisOut@hotmail.invalid.com> wrote:


>>
>>There are about a thousand core worlds and every one of them will want
>>a portion of the naval contract pork.
>
>There isn't that much pork--they don't build very many ships. Most
>worlds don't have the shipyards to build any.

any yard that can build freighters can in fairly short order be
putting out SD/P etc. the sollies have a rather hefty merchy fleet
and they came from somewhere.


>>Does the RMN still have SD's. Their non-Apollo units were on the
>>receiving end of a severe pasting.
>
>They didn't have their entire fleet at Manticore.

not all of it but a rather hefty percentage of their heavy units were
there. the RMN had what about 200 SD's of various flavours in toto?
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian McDonald

External


Since: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 243



(Msg. 55) Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:03 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500, Don Sample <dsample.RemoveThis@synapse.net>
wrote:


>> >even if you visited every wretched system the sollies have mapped it
>> >would be simple enough to build a dozen boltholes in unmapped systems
>> >or even in the empty spaces tween systems.
>> >
>> >one thing the sollies truly have is resources to work with.
>>
>> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
>> systems. That could be a problem, though...
>
>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)

if the sollies have 2000 odd worlds you can walk around on without a
suit then they likely have hundreds of times that many systems
comprised of useless rocks available to choose from.

as for the last logistical purposes are better served by hanging
around populated worlds.
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian McDonald

External


Since: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 243



(Msg. 56) Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:08 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:28:08 -0800, Loren Pechtel
<lorenpechtel.RemoveThis@hotmail.invalid.com> wrote:


>
>Sure you can put the base out there but how are you going to hide the
>electronic emissions?

well an advanced tech doesn't emit a whole lot. ladar instead of
radar and laser comms etc. further the em emissions are going to
expand at the paltry speed of light so it could well be a long time
reaching anyone and even then someone has to be looking fairly hard
for the emissions.

all in all i doubt em emissions are a big concern compared to some of
the other things that might give you away.
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Loren Pechtel

External


Since: Aug 10, 2006
Posts: 365



(Msg. 57) Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:17:54 -0600, Taki Kogoma <quirk.TakeThisOut@swcp.com>
wrote:

>On 2008-02-14, Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel.TakeThisOut@hotmail.invalid.com>
>allegedly proclaimed to alt.books.david-weber:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500, Don Sample <dsample.TakeThisOut@synapse.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
>>>> systems. That could be a problem, though...
>>>
>>>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>>>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>>>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)
>>
>> I got to thinking on this--how well can ships locate a point in deep
>> space?
>
>That was my thoughtt as well; how closely does hyperspace map to the
>Real Universe[(tm) Pat. Pend.]?

I don't think that's a problem. I'm more worried about how accurately
ships can find their way in hyper without reference points. When
you're approaching a star system you can sense it but there's nothing
to home in on for a point in interstellar space unless you leave some
sort of beacon--and you sure don't want to do that on a stealth
facility!
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
phamp

External


Since: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 390



(Msg. 58) Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:05 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Taki Kogoma
<quirk.DeleteThis@swcp.com> wrote on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:17:54 -0600 in
alt.books.david-weber :
>On 2008-02-14, Loren Pechtel <lorenpechtel.DeleteThis@hotmail.invalid.com>
>allegedly proclaimed to alt.books.david-weber:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56:09 -0500, Don Sample <dsample.DeleteThis@synapse.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> The only threat I think is realistic against observers is out between
>>>> systems. That could be a problem, though...
>>>
>>>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>>>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>>>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)
>>
>> I got to thinking on this--how well can ships locate a point in deep
>> space?
>
>That was my thoughtt as well; how closely does hyperspace map to the
>Real Universe[(tm) Pat. Pend.]?

My understanding is that hyper space is a scale model of Normal
Space... only smaller.
--
pyotr filipivich
The two oldest cliches in the book are "The Good Old Days were
better." and "After all, these are Modern TImes."
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
phamp

External


Since: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 390



(Msg. 59) Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:39 am
Post subject: Precipitaing a Manti-Haven alliance v the MEsans was Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Quadibloc
<jsavard RemoveThis @ecn.ab.ca> wrote on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:25:51 -0800 (PST) in
alt.books.david-weber :
>
>First, the evidence of Mesa being behind everything has to percolate
>out. Manticore had suppressed the role of Frontier Security in the
>difficulties surrounding the new Junction terminus because FS is too
>dangerous an enemy, able to mobilize the Solarian League against
>Manticore. But FS can be used as Mesa's tool.

The Manticore Foreign Ministry did not broadcast OFS involvement
in Monica because there was no hard evidence. "When you strike at the
prince, strike surely, or not at all." On a side, it will be
interesting to see how Manpower's mercenary operations does, now that
it's main supplier of forces (Monica) has a non-Aggression pact with
the Star Kingdom.
>
>So Manticore and Haven declare peace, and start going after Mesa.

On what grounds?

So far, all _they_ have is the suspicions of two of their agents,
and one of them (Anton) is on the beach. Granted, before you can
uncover the problem, you have to suspect that there is a problem, but
then you have to convince a whole bunch of people that Mesa really is
the problem. Should be a simple task, Haven is just has to convince
the Manitcorian fire breathers that their Secretary of State screwed
things up for his own reasons - and is dead in a real air car
accident! Not a problem since Elizabeth knows that Haven is the
cause of all unpleasantness, not to mention faking all that diplomatic
correspondence in order to justify their sneak attack.

>Mesa fights back - by using FS to manufacture an incident, and pull
>the Solarian League into a war against Manticore and Haven together.

Rots of ruck on that. Mesa may try, but they have the Maya sector
"against them" already, and who know what other sectors will decide to
sit this one out?

I suspect that the literary maneuvering to get the Manticore-Haven
war shut down and shifted to the Mesa/Manpower sector will be
"interesting". I just hope they will be entertaining.


tschus
pyotr

--
pyotr filipivich
The two oldest cliches in the book are "The Good Old Days were
better." and "After all, these are Modern TImes."
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
J'hn1

External


Since: May 30, 2007
Posts: 43



(Msg. 60) Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:05 am
Post subject: Re: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:03, Loren Pechtel wrote:

>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:56, Don Sample <dsample.DeleteThis@synapse.net> wrote:

>>Why? (Another thing I've never understood about Weber is his insistence
>>on always anchoring his fleets to star systems. Why should the
>>rendezvous point for any fleet be anywhere near any star?)
>
>I got to thinking on this--how well can ships locate a point in deep
>space?

Yes, that is my thought as well. It probably is a problem getting
close enough for a warship fleet to meet even when they can emit all
they want to help each other find that meeting spot. A hidden and
stealthed, probably lightly defended, (if you had heavy defences then
you wouldn't need to hide in the first place) fleet base or
construction yard would be a lot harder to find to meet and deliver
workers and materials and pick up finished ships.
 >> Stay informed about: Anybody interested in seeing Manticore lose? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Book Forums (Home) -> David Weber All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12, 13, 14
Page 4 of 14

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]