Hi Ho Silver (or somebody else of the same name) wrote in message
<gevgc.13680$zj3.12390@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> thusly:
> Opinions vary as to which order is 'best' ; I prefer the order in which
> they were written, but have read them in the chronological order also, and
> either works for me.
> ------------------------
>
> "Thomas Traini" <traini.RemoveThis@wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
> news:_tGdnWFSWZpmZRzdRVn-jg@wideopenwest.com...
>> I've never read any of the books in the Chronicles of Narnia series.
> Should
>> I read them in chronological order or in publication order?
>>
>> Thanks for your advice!
>> Tom
>>
>>
The time order of the books is not really chronological. Example: the action
of "The Horse and his Boy" takes place during the Narnian adulthood of
Susan and the others and therefore fits into the final few paragraphs of
LW&W.
Leave "The Magician's Nephew" until you have read a few of the others. To
me, MN is a rather lesser effort than the others, a rather clumsy prequel
to attempt to set the scene.
Incidentally, note that in LW&W, the title characters are introduced into
the story in the opposite order to which they are named in the title. Any
significance to this?
--
Paul Townsend
I put it down there, and when I went back to it, there it was GONE!
Interchange the alphabetic elements to reply<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: In what order should I read Narnia?