On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:18:19 +0100, Diem <news.TakeThisOut@diemzone.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <KeELa.70732$Io.6616056@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
>m_d_riley@excite.com says...
>> I just managed to delete the spam and since I don't trust myself with
>> electronic gadgets, I'm running a test to see if I've managed to do it
>> properly. Or if I've managed to delete all messages before I have a chance
>> to read them.
>>
>> Jackie
>
>
>Tests, tests. there are too many tests in the world.
>
>Also too much spam. am taking steps myself to reduce the amount and live
>in constant fear of missing stuff i want to see.
>
That's the problem - it is possible to set a computer up to reject
anything that isn't from an "approved" address, but all it takes is
for one address to be missed or changed for good stuff to disappear
into space.
That said, how many of these sites are there? If I were to visit all
of the pornography-or-related-subject-matter sites that I have
advertised to me, I would never have time to do anything else. And
that's not counting all of the stuff that get's filtered out.
(The spam filter at home, who is called Albert, gets far more mail
than I do, and I customarily get sixty or seventy e-mails a day. He
now has something like three or four thousand messages and I don't
think he's yet a year old.)
--
Matthew Francis
-------------------------
ABTH Village Guinea Pig
AFMP Minister for Custard<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: This is a test